theme-sticky-logo-alt
PREVIOUS POST
Party’s Over.
NEXT POST
Multitask.

20 Comments

  • March 5, 2018 at 12:23 am
    TomZ

    1610 CDT.

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 12:26 am
    Deplorable B Woodman

    Some are born to manners, some learn manners, others have manners thrust upon them.

    Meantime, “unleash the hounds of war!” Go get them FIBbies! No quarter asked nor given!

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 12:32 am
    Deplorable B Woodman

    No more Wacos! If the FIBbies have a warrant, if they want to speak to anyone at the DD, come and knock on the front door during normal daytime hours. No more sneak attacks in the quiet of the night while prepping for bed.

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 12:33 am
    Deplorable B Woodman

    BTW, is it “to the manner born”? Or is it “to the manor born”?

    REPLY
    • March 5, 2018 at 12:58 am

      Yes. And with entirely different meaning.

      And from our host’s coinage, we can infer a third.

      Dude does slip some shit in.

      REPLY
    • March 5, 2018 at 3:09 pm
      gruundehn

      The original saying was “manor” but the times have added the other meaning, and word, so that either is correct.

      REPLY
      • March 5, 2018 at 3:55 pm

        I do enjoy words, meanings, and usages.

        And actually my understanding of the term as coined by Shakespeare’s Hamlet was “manner”, meaning a particular set of responsibilities, behaviors, or traditions to follow…much later and now much more prevalent applied as “manor”, born to aristocracy, wealth, or privilege.

        But I particularly like Chris’ addition of the “s” to create an entirely new meaning of being bred, taught, or in this case created to be proper, formal, or like Jeeves here, obsequious.

  • March 5, 2018 at 12:36 am

    I’ll take my ‘borgs efficient, *can the “manners”.

    *as in tin-can, you pretentious wannabe elitist.

    Plenty of that glad-handing back-stabbing PC BS in meatspace.

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 12:37 am
    WayneM

    If I’m reading this correctly, R200 is more closely integrated to DDNet’s sensor array than Jeeves who is local? Given the latency inherent in networks, that’s a design flaw.

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 1:45 am

    Mission first.

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 1:55 am
    John T. Block

    Where are the Dawgs at? Seems they’d be programmed to see Feds as well as illegals…

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 2:22 am
    Fox2!

    Why does Jeeves remind me of a certain golden ‘droid?

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 4:26 am
    Henry

    Um, shouldn’t that be “molto bella?”

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 5:22 am
    JackDeth 72

    Wait… What?

    Jeeves is showing signs of The Seven Deadly Sins (Envy) through naughty language?

    Currently calculating the odds of an open corral gate and Tobasco joining the party.

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 7:04 am
    Bill G

    Instead of noblesse oblige, we’ve got robot oblige?

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 11:37 am
    KenH

    The Arnie-droid is correct
    I want an 800 Series Model 101
    NOT frappin 3Po….

    REPLY
  • March 5, 2018 at 12:58 pm
    GruntGI

    Well, I’m pretty sure Zed is not gonna be happy his boob tube show got interrupted.

    Sending the robodogs to investigate may be the most humane way to deal with the intruders.

    REPLY
    • March 5, 2018 at 2:49 pm
      MasterDiver

      Dealing with FIBbers? I got yer “humane ways” right heerrre!

      Zar Belk!

      REPLY
      • March 5, 2018 at 9:23 pm
        Deplorable B Woodman

        Three thumbs up! And I have only two hands!

  • March 6, 2018 at 12:20 am
    lurking

    Prob is, it would take two dogs to EFFECTIVELY insert the probe. One to pin him down, the other to do the nasty.

    With a hominid form, and hands, it’s just a matter of hydraulics.

    REPLY

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.daybydaycartoon.com 300 0