Mitt Redux.
Sunday Movies!


  • September 2, 2016 at 9:23 pm

    And Bill Nye the “Science” Guy wants to purge the non-AGW believers. If they all get their wish, there’ll be no one left.

    • September 2, 2016 at 9:30 pm

      Perhaps that’s their goal?

      • September 2, 2016 at 11:02 pm

        The Enlightened Elite’ believe that they are entitled to have Holy Mother Gaia all to themselves. Along with about ten slaves and two “overseers” (armed thugs) each.

        If they ever manage to weaponize anything like Ebola or Zika, expect a Rainbow Six scenario to at least be attempted.

        clear ether


      • September 3, 2016 at 1:22 am

        It is their goal, without doubt. Read “The Gulag Archipeligo” by Alexander Solzhynitzyn, he describes it perfectly from within.

      • September 3, 2016 at 6:07 am

        Another interesting read:

        This was written of course by a leftist fanatic. But it demonstrates how it is so very important that electoral votes in each state be awarded in proportion rather than winner-take-all. Otherwise the major population centers in each state, who are generally heavily democrat, will consistently overcome the will of suburban and rural voters.

      • September 3, 2016 at 10:37 am

        Wow, having lived in the Seattle area for 34 years (escaped last year) I would usually have ignored a link to the stranger, but since a DBD reader said it was “interesting” I went ahead and clicked.
        I was immensely entertained, it was a comprehensive journal of everything that is wrong with the Democrats way of thinking (of course presented the other way around, as usual). It’s great to see them so confident that they feel no need to moderate their feelings and goals for “everyone else”, not to mention the irony that the “democratic” party seems to believe in minority rule.

        By applying the two filters, this truly was enlightening.
        1) They lie all the time.
        2) They are what they accuse others of being.

        The best part is that they are doubling down on the behavior that has been losing constituencies. I say GO FOR IT!

      • September 3, 2016 at 9:19 pm

        I think they’re panicking. They’re seeing their goal slip away from them as the American majority start to wake up, so they’re doubling down and becoming more agressive.
        Sort of like steering into a skid, which doesn’t work too well when you’re already in a spin.

    • September 2, 2016 at 9:56 pm

      It’s strange that, despite the loud and boisterous claims of pollution, polluted air, temperatures rising drastically, the sky is so clear that I can see the moon setting at 12 o’clock noon. Under the right conditions, the air is so clear, it’s a very dark blue — in the daytime. And at night, there isn’t enough water vapor in the atmosphere to keep the daytime solar heat at ground level, so it radiates back into space, dropping the night-time temperature by as much as 20F.

      Very strange.

      Bill Nye is really a plumber or something, isn’t he? He’s really out of step. It’s no longer AGW. It’s climate change. He’s forgetting how many times the climate has changed in the past 600 million years, never mind since the last glacial maximum. How out of touch IS he?

      • September 2, 2016 at 10:40 pm

        They claim it’s carbon dioxide that’s the problem, now.

      • September 3, 2016 at 12:35 am

        Finally they admit that the problem is that we live and breathe.

      • September 3, 2016 at 1:23 am

        It is their goal, without doubt. Read “The Gulag Archipeligo” by Alexander Solzhynitzyn, he describes it perfectly from within.

      • September 3, 2016 at 2:27 pm
        John Greer

        I find it truly ironic that the Global Warming crowd switched to calling it Climate Change and then accused those who opposed them Climate Change Deniers.
        The Climate has always changed. It is in constant flux and always has been.
        The true Climate Change Deniers are those who want to stop the change.
        Climate Stasis is their goal and it is impossible, no matter how much of our blood and treasure they squander.

      • September 3, 2016 at 7:52 pm
        Pete in NC

        I understand that Bill Nye has an engineering degree, not science.

  • September 2, 2016 at 9:35 pm

    There’s a classic joke that says if Democrats filed a bill to burn down the Library of Congress, Republicans would counter with amendments requiring that the arson be phased in over five years.

    Goldberg is butthurt because an increasing number of conservative Americans are no longer golf-clapping that sort of nonsense.

    • September 3, 2016 at 12:53 pm

      Then you’ve obviously never read much of Jonah’s work.

  • September 2, 2016 at 10:18 pm

    Binge Purging is really unhealthy. No stability in the outcome.

  • September 2, 2016 at 10:21 pm

    This is just dumb. Wasn’t Damon raised by white adoptive parents? Guess what the alt-right would call Damon’s father? What would they call his mixed-race son? Doubt me? Read Nick Searcy’s twitter feed.
    The alt-right is racist trash who would hate [if a real person] the character you have defending them, Chris, and his entire family.

    • September 2, 2016 at 10:44 pm

      One of the major alt-right is a flaming gay, Brit with a thang for black guys. Might wish to rethink your statement.

      • September 2, 2016 at 10:58 pm

        Milo isn’t alt-right. The fact that he’s not going to get pregnant, no matter who he sleeps with, renders his racial preference in dick irrelevant, even if he was.

      • September 2, 2016 at 11:41 pm

        He says he is.

    • September 2, 2016 at 10:47 pm
      Doo-Dah, Doo-Dah

      I guess I need to know the answer to one major question:

      “Who, EXACTLY, gets to define who-and-what ‘the alt-right’ is?”

      I don’t know anybody who self-identifies as ‘alt-right’, and I really have no clue what {whoever-they-are} considers to be their core principles.

      So, if anybody here knows, please enlighten a fellow, mostly-conservative, anti-One-World, pro-Contitutionalist, Seeker of Truth.


    • September 2, 2016 at 10:58 pm

      Your indoctrination is showing through. It’s not your fault. Leftists have been shoving into our heads all our lives what they think is “racist.” The whole of the alt-right believes that all ethnic groups have their own right to a land for themselves, to govern themselves and have their own customs and morality. Japanese people are the only ones who can make Japanese culture. Same goes for every other ethnic group. The indoctrination that you don’t even know is in you comes when the suggestion that whites have that same right to their own nation and culture. Every other ethnic group in the world has their own nation(s) and they do what they can to keep them pure. Never is considered racist. However, when white people want their own nation as well, that IS considered racist. Why is that?
      If you want to see some other views as to immigration, look to the Founding Fathers. They weren’t big on it at all. In fact, they were against it. They created the nation for a specific type of people: European Christians. Because, just like the Japanese example above, it takes White people to make white culture and white government. Whites created Western civilization, and immigrants have come here and have watered it down little by little, with the worst turning into what is is now. Do you like the fact that whites will be a minority in this nation soon enough? What do you think your life will be like when minorities rule in all sections of government? Immigrants come here and vastly vote Democrat. They love big government and lots of rules. They don’t understand nor care for the white idea of limited government and freedom to live as you wish as long as you don’t harm anyone else.
      So the alt-right wants a white nation ruled by white people free of the damage done by immigrants who come here to get what we have but don’t have the capacity or desire to maintain Western civilization. They also want all other races to have their own nations and run themselves however they see fit.
      This goes against what leftists want so terribly much that they are already falling into their typical “demonize” mode. They did the same thing to conservatives, and still do, but in this case it’s different because conservatives who have been taught one mode of thinking all of their lives are running with the knee-jerk reaction they’ve been programmed with and not stopping to view reality. Diversity+proximity+time=war. Even if you wish to play “super non-racist leftists-please-love-me virtue signaler,” the minorities won’t. Your skin color will be your uniform. They don’t have any problem with their nations being pure, and they won’t have any problem taking over this nation and turning into the same kind of pit they came from.
      Remember, the Constitution is freely available. If these other countries wanted to have their own version of the U.S., they could copy it and tweak it for themselves and have a nice, small, limited government that respected the freedom and rights of people like ours did. But they don’t do that. Ask yourself why.

      • September 2, 2016 at 11:05 pm


      • September 2, 2016 at 11:24 pm

        Wow, what a very well thought out, detailed reply full of facts, information, and reasoned arguments.

        That’s fine. Be a cuckservative. Suck up to the leftists and show them you’re “not a racist” just the way they want you to. In another few years, look around the country and see if it’s improving, and if all the other ethnic groups are adding to the culture or damaging it. Reality will win out.

        Indoctrination is hard to get out of your head, but you do have to at least try.

      • September 3, 2016 at 1:42 pm

        That was more reply than your silly notions dressed up in word salad deserve.

        I’m not a racist by not being racist. That’s it.

        If you think there is a distinct ‘white culture’ that needs preservation by separation…you’re a racist.
        If you think there is a distinct ‘black culture’ that needs preservation by separation…you’re a racist.

        If you judge people based on phenotype group, rather than individual behavior, you’re a racist.
        The political left is generally a lot more racist than the right, and you fringe nutcases are the exception. Make no mistake, you are a fringe, and you are every bit as unhinged as the BLM nuts.

      • September 3, 2016 at 3:30 pm

        “That was more reply than your silly notions dressed up in word salad deserve.”

        Code for “I have nothing.”

        “I’m not a racist by not being racist. That’s it.”

        No, who said one race was superior to another?

        “If you think there is a distinct ‘white culture’ that needs preservation by separation…you’re a racist.”

        No, you’re a realist. You don’t think there’s a distinct Japanese culture? Seriously? You think you could take a Japanese person, or a Chinese person, or an Arab, stick him in a Hispanic culture, and he wouldn’t notice a difference? That’s hilarious. I guess you never heard of “culture shock,” have you? Let me help you:

        “a sense of confusion and uncertainty sometimes with feelings of anxiety that may affect people exposed to an alien culture or environment without adequate preparation”

        So, exactly how is this possible if there are no distinct cultures? And then explain how these cultures can be preserved WITHOUT being separated, because, uh duh, they are right now. You don’t see Chinese culture taking up half of Brazil, do you? How about Japanese culture staying pure with a quarter of it in Canada? Are you actually saying that if Muslims took their “culture” and moved to Japan, without killing anyone for once, and bred until they were 1/2 of the population, there wouldn’t be a culture change? The two would be the same as they are now, with no overlap? Both would be unique and not blended together?

        Now, if you can finally start to see that there are distinct cultures, having successfully learned something (I know, I’m making a huge assumption here), do you think they should or should not be preserved? If you don’t think they should be preserved, you are now advocating the elimination of cultures. How racist! Or are you just stupid enough to say there’s no white culture even though all of these other cultures have just been shown to you to actually, in reality, exist?

        “The political left is generally a lot more racist than the right, and you fringe nutcases are the exception.”

        Ah, more demonization since you have no valid argument to counter. How leftist of you.

        A racist is someone who sees all people of another race or races as inferior or worthy of hate based simply on their skin color. I don’t hate Hispanic people. I don’t hate Japanese people, etc. But, I can recognize that different races wish to govern themselves and have their own unique cultures without being destroyed by immigration or invasion.

        Now, try answering the questions I asked you, if you can. I think you’re afraid of answering honestly because you know what conclusions you will come to, and your indoctrination is flashing “bad think” inside your skull. Don’t listen to it. Break through if you can.

        Oh, and here’s some info from another site, using the cartoon posted above as a jumping off point.

        Alt-right is not Freddy Krueger

      • September 3, 2016 at 7:53 pm

        Odd, you don’t seemed like the type to get overwhelmed by the number of a words in a sentence, and stop reading, but you apparently did. This part: “…that needs preservation by separation…” is pretty crucial. I place absolutely no value on the cultural purity you imagine is important. It isn’t. It isn’t. because it doesn’t exist. Cultures don’t need to be preserved, and they actually can’t be preserved, because time will continue to pass, and literally every thing that happens to more than one person changes their culture, however slightly.
        You also don’t seem to understand that culture isn’t genetic. Of course there is a distinct Japanese culture, but it has jack shit to do with the Japanese phenotype, to extent that such a thing even exists. Japanese culture now includes many things adopted from elsewhere, and yet Japanese culture still exists. Even if the Japanese collectively decided to start speaking English exclusively and abandon rice paper entirely, there would still be a distinct Japanese culture. There culture of Japan, whatever the details might be, is Japanese culture. There’s also a distinct American culture, that arose out of the interaction and intermingling of dozens of other distinct cultures. There is no distinct ‘white’ culture, because white people have formed, again, dozens of cultures all over the world.

        I can’t answer your questions without pretending that your framing of these issues in a fringe, nutcase way has validity. So, no, you’re not getting what you want, there. You’re also not getting any more replies from me.

      • September 2, 2016 at 11:39 pm

        Very thoughtful and many good areas of consideration.

        The beacon was supposed to shine the Light of Freedom on the World. For the world to use.
        It seems that masses have been coming here or sent here as asymmetric invading armies to put out the Light of Freedom.

      • September 3, 2016 at 7:06 am
        Bill G

        That is what I was taught in school, all those years back.
        The Light was to be a beacon illuminating what has been done here, so that others can copy it in other places, for themselves.

      • September 3, 2016 at 10:22 am

        Turns out making evolving a progressive utopia from scratch is HARD because first you have to have the scratch. Much easier to take your conservative scratch and devolve itl.

      • September 3, 2016 at 10:51 am

        “Your skin color will be your uniform.”

        The war will be quite short, and sound like this:


      • September 3, 2016 at 6:00 pm

        Right on the money, CO. The Left is so good at using the distortion of the English language to create animosity between otherwise agreeable groups of conservatives that it amazes me when people look closely enough to see through the smoke and mirrors. Thanks for your post.

  • September 2, 2016 at 11:09 pm
    Kevin M

    One of your finest panels, sir.

  • September 2, 2016 at 11:13 pm
    Chris Muir
    • September 2, 2016 at 11:19 pm

      Well put.

      • September 2, 2016 at 11:28 pm

        I mean that in as good information and viewpoint to be looked at. Not an agreement with his total argument. Different views must be looked at.

      • September 2, 2016 at 11:37 pm

        Aw carp. I was also reading the National Review article above. But in general the comment stands. And the site you list above is still very well put. It invites discussion and consideration of acts that may need to be taken. There is much discussion and decisions that our nation has avoided due to many people’s personal benefit and agendas being filled by avoiding discussions and actions on those matters. A very good article.

    • September 2, 2016 at 11:25 pm
      Blue Quasar

      Spot on. Voters add a thin veneer of legitimacy to the [s]election process.

    • September 2, 2016 at 11:58 pm
      Tim Moyer

      very well said, Chris.

  • September 2, 2016 at 11:13 pm

    Hillary Clinton knows who the alt-right are. they are all who oppose her, I believe she would say.
    She called Alex Jones of and alt-right enemy who hillary says has a very dark heart. Coming from Hillary, that is a badge of honor.
    Alex Jones is a descendant of several mayflower riders. He also has other including both sides of the Texas War of Independence. He is part MEXICAN.

    That is to check out this Hillary named absolutely black hearted ALT-Right.
    Yeah. Drudge is another Alt-right named by Hillary and associates. HORRORS! HORRORS!
    Drudge gave his only interview in at least seven years by walking unannounced onto Alex’s show last year and telling how a Supreme court justice had told him how the crack down on free speech was coming this year. Drudge said that many web sites would be attacked and would be shut down if they succeeded. Drudge said that censorship in the USA and across the world would increase. It has.
    Hillary Clinton also named as an alt-right site. HORRORS! HORRORS!
    Hillary Clinton said that she would shut them down if she had the power.
    Then there are the masses of smaller sites. i would say that most of them love everybody. Many would use the second amendment rights against those that would try to kill them. HORRORS! HORRORS!

    This sight would likely be labeled an alt-right site by Hillary Clinton. THE DDQ ALT-RIGHT. HORRORS! HORRORS! Say it isn’t so. (Or say it is so. I still don’t know what really goes on in Hillary Clinton’s brain and that of progressives and NeoCons. Nor do I really want to know that well what they think.)

    • September 3, 2016 at 1:02 am

      Myself I see very early signs of Alzheimer’s in her. I could be wrong.

      • September 3, 2016 at 2:09 am

        Listening to the many doctors commenting on her possible conditions from available information, dementia is just one possible problem.
        She may just exist in the moment with memories of things like Benghazi gone.
        That doctor with the epipen reoriented her to where ashe was. he soothed her. Comforted her. Told her to keep talking, as well as gave her the injection. Hillary reoriented and went on with her prepared speaking performance.
        Trump should have a “virtual” debate using past videos of Hillary answering questions and printed responses to past questions. possibly a stand in can deliver her past comments. Also a true explanation of what she has done could also be in the broadcast. he could also answer the same questions. maybe even have someone give the Leftist criticism of his responses for him to answer.
        At this point Hillary seems to only be able to do limited engagements. I doubt she could directly confront a Trump who is calm, cool, collected, factual, polite, and blunt.
        The chance of Hillary speaking at a debate for two hours is negligible in many doctor’s opinions. I wonder if Hillary could be drugged up to do such a debate. The Matt Lauer designed debate is a trap with likely current Obama appointed officers there to attack him in some way, as opposed to the military as a whole. This is a tricky negotiating and public perception time with this first candidate exposition of Hillary, and roast and burning at the stake of Trump they have scheduled

      • September 3, 2016 at 10:49 am

        Bathroom breaks not allowed and/or independently monitored.

        Howdja like to have that job?

      • September 3, 2016 at 2:26 am

        Democrat VP candidate Tim Kaine stated among other things:
        “We want to make sure that candidates aren’t involved in any foreign entanglements that could impact our national security, and we want to know that they’re in good-enough health to perform their duties,” Kaine added. “When candidates are on the up-and-up, they have no problem disclosing information on all these points. You have a right to know. You have a right to expect, and a candidate that’s on the up-and-up has no problem giving you the facts.”

        Video of candidate Kaine speaking is on that site.

      • September 3, 2016 at 4:29 am

        The Demo☭rats scream, shout, rant, rage against anyone who’s engaged in foreign entanglements who do not represent the government…
        …unless it’s their candidate who’s doing the engaging. Then it’s OK.

      • September 3, 2016 at 7:20 am
        Bill G

        As always. Just as when a Republican is in the Oval Office the most ridiculous charge of misbehavior results in screaming headlines: SERIOUS CHARGES MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY!!”
        But if a democrat has turned the Oval Office into the offal office and someone like Juanita Broderick cries “Rape” the LSM response is “Grape? Drape? What’s she talking about? Get that crazy broad outta here!”

    • September 3, 2016 at 1:41 am

      alex jones is a graduate of the same program that Hal Turner was part of, which is another remnant of the PATCON program from the 1990’s.

      I wouldn’t trust anything from infowars I couldn’t independently verify.

      • September 3, 2016 at 12:00 pm

        You sound like what Alex Jones says. Alex says to verify everything he or anyone says on his site independently. Get to know things for yourself. That is the best. The more independently functioning, resourced, and knowledgeable good people, the better. There are a lot of bad apples in the world. And parts of the government will try to pair people with them, or create a case out of nothing against the good people.

      • September 3, 2016 at 1:26 pm

        Then again I don’t trust anything on Wikipedia Opinion site either.

      • September 3, 2016 at 3:31 pm

        the “hal turner is an FBI informant” has been well known for years. he admits it himself. I simply use the wikipedia page as a central information point. but here you go..

        he was trained. told how far he could go without getting in trouble. the FBI even called it a “program”.

        they don’t come up with a “program” for just one guy…..

  • September 2, 2016 at 11:57 pm

    Lawyer for alt-right’er WIKILEAKS Julian Assage bites the dust in front of a train in the UK.

    • September 3, 2016 at 12:31 am

      “The death is being called a suicide…and his death is not being treated as suspicious.”

      I guess that’s accurate in the sense that making the enemies list even by association could be considered suicidal. And not suspicious at all since everyone knows what happened. Hopefully Assange spread his lawyer/client privilege around a little bit with pertinent thumb-drives, just in case the Clinton mafia operatives infiltrate the Equadorean embassy.

      • September 3, 2016 at 1:03 am

        Good observation. Crossing Hillary may be suicidal. Also Hillary’s opponents often commit suicide by several bullets to the back of their head, and stuff like that. It aint nothing until the referee calls it.

  • September 3, 2016 at 12:13 am

    Guess these alt-righters are getting pretty mainstream…

    What happens when everyone but her hard core make her enemies list?

    Former presidential candidate and first “female” nominee of a major political party Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes just an historical footnote, that’s what.

    • September 3, 2016 at 7:27 am
      Bill G

      If you are not a hardcore supporter of her, you are on her enemies list.
      What tier you are on varies with your power to have an effect on her campaign.

  • September 3, 2016 at 12:22 am

    Hilly must be afraid if she’s bringing up the alt-right.
    She always requires a boogie-man in the woods with a chainsaw to deflect.

    • September 3, 2016 at 6:16 pm

      Hillary is simply a sock-puppet who is greedy for money and the power to make others do what she wants or suffer the consequences of her anger. The fact that she can be medicated in public and re-programmed to complete her speech gives some indication of her mental status – controlled by someone in the background.

      The frightening thing is that she actually will probably be “elected” or at least announced as the winner. Think about it: if she can actually admit to doing something – like deleting her governmental emails – which, if convicted, provides a penalty that includes never ever holding a public office again and STILL is allowed to run for the highest office in the land, with the FBI and DOJ saying there is nobody who will take her to trial, how can you imagine she can fail to be “appointed” as the next President of the U.S.?

      It is obvious that everyone who has ever been in a position to provide damning evidence against her or Bill – including four who have died in just the last month – have been killed, including a variety of non-suicidal deaths simply labeled as suicides. She – and the people who are operating her – have such power, or enough damning evidence against the Obama administration and others in high offices that they can not only get away with murder but with indisputable treason as well.

      I wish it were otherwise, but I see no way short of revolution that she will failed to be named the next President of the FUSA.

      • September 3, 2016 at 9:29 pm

        An inadvertent mix-up with all the meds she’s on would solve the problem.

  • September 3, 2016 at 1:31 am

    All good, y’all.

  • September 3, 2016 at 3:26 am
    Neal Getz

    BOOOO. Goldberg does more each week to fight for conservative goals and against the left than Cheeto Jesus has in 40 years of public life. Consider how any other GOP candidate would be beating Hillary like a rented mule, yet Trump can’t be bothered to do any of the actual work it would take. And if you can’t recognize the masses of self-identified racists in the alt-right morass, you’re part of the idiocracy that will keep Democrats in the White House for the next 40 years.

    • September 3, 2016 at 9:36 am

      Boo indeed. Trying to lift this line of argument supporting the self identified racistsis in the “alt-right” is much like attempting to pick up Molinjor. The racist Birchers were shunted and pushed back into the fringes half a century ago.

    • September 3, 2016 at 11:14 am

      I would observe that the idiocracy of radical, militant, self-identified racists who have been in the White House for the last eight years render that part of your argument erroneous, irrelevant, and moot.

      And I’m pretty sure based on empirical evidence i.e. 2008 and 2012, that any GOPe candidate, far from beating it, would end up riding that donkey (not mule), jack or jenny alike.

    • September 3, 2016 at 1:37 pm
      Grunt GI

      Hmmm, “any other GOP candidate would be beating Hillary like a rented mule.” I wonder? If Hillary is so beatable, why aren’t Republicans standing together? I mean Trump is far from a perfect candidate, but he appears to be willing to learn, and change (although some people may not like that)..but overall if the Republican leadership would pitch in, provide some basic political instruction and assistance and UNITY, Trump has the ability to hammer Hillary.

      NO OTHER Republican would go after her like Trump has because they don’t want to be called “sexist”…just like no Republican really went after Obama for his MYRIAD of character and ethical flaws because they were afraid of being called racist (WHICH, by the way, they were anyway). The whole CROOKED HILLARY thing is political genius, because it’s true…the campaign commercials almost produce themselves…and the RNC and all the other “CONSERVATIVE” groups should be hammering Hillary 24/7.

      But it seems to me that they are more afraid of Trump the Hillary…which is absurd…on his WORST CRAZIEST day, I don’t think Trump could do anything more damaging than Hillary…and hers will be by DESIGN…

      No doubt it is sad that more Americans will be voting against someone than for someone (including me, to be honest), but I cannot stomach the idea of that woman in the White House, and I would vote for my neighbor’s dog before I voted for her…at least when the dog poops you can scoop it up..when Hillary poops, it will be on America.

  • September 3, 2016 at 7:30 am
    Bill G

    Us against Them is a major page in the democrat playbook.
    E Pluribus Unum is our founder’s ideal.

  • September 3, 2016 at 8:13 am

    Nice work, Chris. You got 2 birds with one stone.

  • September 3, 2016 at 10:27 am

    Frail, Elderly Woman with Memory Problem Wants to Be President! … enough said

  • September 3, 2016 at 11:17 am
    Grunt GI

    The sad thing is that “mainstream” Republicans are still not asking themselves WHY Donald Trump, a political neophyte, whipped a field of 16 of very experienced politicians?

    Why are “Republicans” upset? Why are “conservatives” upset? It’s too easy for old guard “moderate” Republicans to just write this off as some sort of knee-jerk or racist reaction.

    In my opinion, the current Republican Party simply has no big bold ideas to rebuild America and American’s confidence in their government, other than free trade and tax cuts, which even ardent Republicans are not so sure of anymore.

    There hasn’t been anything like the Contract with America since, well since there was the Contract with America. Republicans seem to be stuck in the old mantra of “Hey, we’re Republicans, we’re not as mean as you think.” Which will always be a losing proposition for both the enemies and their supporters.

    What do I mean by this…well, Republicans can never out Santa Claus the Democrats…anytime the Republicans try to use government to help some problems, the Democrats can always trump them (no pun intended)..examples…

    Republicans- “We need intelligent immigration reform to help protect our borders and provide a path to citizenship.”
    Democrats- “IMMEDIATE AMNESTY! And sign them up as Democratic voters!”

    Republicans- “We need to reform our student loan system to help ease the ability to pay them back.”
    Democrats- “FREE COLLEGE FOR EVERYONE! And sign them up as Democratic voters!”

    Republicans- “Welfare reform helps put people to work and improve their lives.”
    Democrats- “MORE FREE STUFF PAID FOR BY RICH PEOPLE! And sign them up as Democractic voters!”

    Trump, as imperfect as he is, at some level GETS THIS and Jeb Bush, et, al. does not. Americans are genuinely and sincerely afraid for their future, but instead of honestly addressing their LEGITIMATE fears about the kind of country we leave our children and grandchildren, politicians on both sides label us as xenophobic, bigoted racists, which allows them to smile in their smug liberal moral superiority (misplaced as that is) but does not solve the fundamental problem.

    ON a lighter note, when things to go hell in a hand basket, which they will no matter who is elected, it will be interesting to see how Hillary, if she wins, tries to deflect blame, which liberals always do, on her predecessor….

    • September 3, 2016 at 11:50 am

      Dang, GGI, you DO care about something other than nekkid Sam!

      Very well written and very cogent commentary right there.

      • September 3, 2016 at 12:10 pm
        Grunt GI

        Oh, I still care about nekkid Sam, and nekked Jan, well hell all the DDQ girls nekked….don’t get me wrong 🙂

        But it is still mystifying and REALLY annoying that the Republican Party is not doing a proper debrief of their own PRIMARY process and results. TRUMP WON and WON BIG…and they aren’t asking WHY? They are ASSUMING that all his supporters are racist ignorant white trash…WELL, from a cynical political position, those white trash VOTE, so why aren’t Republicans trying to address their fears and concerns in a logical manner?

        I mean sure as HELL the Democratic Party has abandoned the old Reagan Democrats—blue collar, non-college educated white voters….and there are still a hell of a lot of them out there….and they could be a critical voting bloc if Republicans would just pay attention.

        Sadly, the Republicans are, to coin a phrase offering different shades of progressivism…the ol “Democrate-lite” I mentioned above….and it is going to keep losing them elections and eventually contributing to their going the way of the Whig Party…they will NEVER pull away any progressive votes and if the current Libertarian Party candidate is any measure, they will never get the votes of those dope smoking hippies either.

        A seriously well thought out CONTRACT WITH AMERICA that address immigration, the loss of jobs, taxes, national security, and the general restoration of genuine law and order could be a big winner…but I don’t think the current leadership has the guts to sit down with the Donald and make a deal. Hillary is the WORST CANDIDATE in the history of the Democratic Party…hell Walter Mondale is a statesman compared to her and he was a moron…if they can’t get their shit together and beat her, well….

  • September 3, 2016 at 11:45 am

    Alt-right. I suppose, in the “broad spectrum”, I fall within that description. I am an AMERICAN, first and foremost. As, it would appear, is almost every single body here. Rather than go in and out of that article I suggest sitting with your cup of coffee and reading it. I’m more pissed off with all this welfareamnestyfreestuffdependency bullshit than you can imagine. If the voting restrictions were as they were during the founding of this nation, we wouldn’t have this crap near as deeply entrenched as it is. I’ve got a post simmering in my head related to this strip, when it reaches full boil I’ll write it. Sure, out of human decency, if someone falls and skins their knee you help them to their feet. You don’t put them on a stretcher and put them on life support until the day they die.

  • September 3, 2016 at 12:36 pm

    They use the Alinsky rules.

    13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

    A source for a list of the “rules.”

  • September 3, 2016 at 12:47 pm

    Wow. For once I have to call you out Chris. That is a bullshit thing to say about Goldberg.
    The article you link is correct in that the Republican party and many of its supporters are losing their frickin’ minds over this election. They are wasting a lot of breath and ink trying to defend some crazy people. Note, many of these supporters said some pretty nasty things about Trump – in relation to this exact topic – not that many weeks ago.
    You can say that Goldberg is wrong about Trump. I don’t agree with him on everything about The Donald. But you can NOT legitimately say he’s kissing the establishment ass.
    Goldberg isn’t the one flip-flopping now that Donald is the Republican nominee. He isn’t NeverTrump.

    Chris, you of all people should understand the concept of not swaying from your stance based on someone’s popularity.
    If you’re pro-Trump, fine. But if you can’t hear a legitimate criticism without labeling someone like Jonah a “cuckservative” then you’re not nearly as smart as I was giving you credit for.

    • September 3, 2016 at 1:33 pm
      Chris Muir

      Goldberg does excellent work,such as his tome, Liberal Fascism. But the atavistic virtue signaling response generated of any mention of how races do group together-extant all over the world-is equal to racism or white superiority is a fascinating topic.Goldberg promotes a false virtue that specifically empowers the establishment by shutting down speech with his ‘purge’ article.Look, genetics, race, culture, evolution, politics are inextricably mixed with each and every person on the planet.So why the taboo on the white race, the one group not allowed to celebrate its heritage-and I speak specifically of the Age of Enlightenment, of Reason, aka Western Civilization.
      GWB, I thus call you out for not using Reason, and for having no legitimate criticism.

      • September 3, 2016 at 1:52 pm
        Grunt GI

        Well said. My favorite grouchy guy, LTC Ralph Peters, wrote about this 10 years ago in an outstanding essay…

        Read the whole thing…this idea of endless diversity and harmony is reaching its limits…just like globalization and free trade/migration…Why? Because it benefits the few “globalists’–politicians, big corporations, big banks, dictators and thugs…although I may repeat myself.

        And now we see the results of the endless division of America into “tribes,” primarily by the modern Democratic Party in order to attract grievance groups who want something from their supposed white male oppressors. Of course, the irony is that now you see the left eat itself as Hispanics, Blacks, Gays, and Women are all arguing about who’s the most oppressed and who deserves the most government handouts…again from those oppressive white males.

        Here’s a money quote from Ralph: “Our insistence that human beings will grow ever more alike defies the historical evidence, as well as practical and spiritual needs. Paradoxically, we make a great fuss of celebrating diversity, yet claim that human values are converging. We, too, have our superstitions and taboos.”

        SO, am I surprised at the rise of the “WHITE TRIBE?” NO, not really. It is the inevitable result of the last 60 years of the failed divisive policies of the progressive left, often aided and abetted by SOME conservatives that makes it the “white man’s burden” to put up with the lunacy of BLM, LaRaza, NOW, NAMBLA, and all those loony organizations.

        As the old say goes, Grouchy Old White Male Heterosexual Christian Veterans are not going to take it anymore. If that makes us racist because I don’t feel I owe a black man anything for slavery that ended 150 years ago, a Hispanic illegal alien anything because he came to my country and broke our laws and now DEMANDS citizenship or the gay man that says I have to change 2000 years of Judeo-Christian morals because he likes anal sex…then yea, count me in….

        DAMN, life was so much easier just thinking about nekkid Sam…. 🙁

        Off to get a beer now…it’s five o’clock somewhere….

      • September 3, 2016 at 4:53 pm

        Thank you for responding, Chris.
        I understand your point about virtue-signalling. But that virtue-signalling isn’t based on some desire to maintain his place in DC. He’s written several pieces telling everyone with party invites they can go to hell if they don’t like his principles. It really isn’t fair to call him “cuckservative” for virtue-signalling.
        If you have read his body of work, then you will also know that he has most certainly not confined his racist “purge” calls to whites. He points out that idiocy on the left as well.

        I have often said that I would accept any endorsement if I were running for office (“I abhor child molestation, but even those monsters can see I’m right about this!”). But there certainly are some conservatives Republicans that are wasting time and energy defending this group of folks. Why? Simply because they aren’t on the other side of the political tug-of-war? Simply because they’ve endorsed “our guy”? How are they different from La Raza or BLM?

        I think a lot of this depends on how you define the group supposedly being “attacked”. If you define “alt-right” as anyone that isn’t a conventional Republican or moderate conservative, then complaining about calls to “oust the alt-right” is well within normalcy. But that is NOT how “alt-right” is defined by those who came up with the moniker. They define it as white separatists. If you’re going to use their word, then you have to accept their definition, to a point.
        (Yes, they define it that way, then APPLY it to all of us as a smear. That’s why it is a smear.)

        I won’t ever accept racism – from anyone. That IS Reason talking. You want to talk about cultures and ideologies, fine. But those are not race, and are not defined by such. Leave that nonsense to the a*holes on the left. Let them promote tribalism. Let’s us promote the brotherhood of man and the great freedoms that can only have real meaning if we apply them equally.

      • September 3, 2016 at 7:56 pm
        Chris Muir

        Fair ’nuff,I’ll be exploring this the next week;see what you think.But,
        who exactly, is’ they’ from whence you extrapolated your definition?

      • September 3, 2016 at 8:58 pm
        Grunt GI

        Hmmm. Can’t wait to see how Damon handles this with Jan. I see a lot of promise in her…
        And of course, Damon is good at getting to the naked truth of an issue.

        Just sayin’.

      • September 3, 2016 at 6:49 pm

        Well said, Chris, and although Goldberg has written many good articles, he sometimes flags as an “establishment conservative”, missing the forest for the trees. Anyone who thinks he is infallible, or possesses a true conservative heart free of the GOPe disorder are fooling themselves.

  • September 3, 2016 at 1:44 pm

    So I read all this ‘Sturm und Drang’ about Goldberg’s article and boiled down he has Hildabeast saying: “This is not conservatism as we have known it,” the politician said. “This is not Republicanism as we have known it.”
    In other words, these people are not laying down and letting us do whatever we want the way they have for many years.
    Basically unless us peons somehow take control, we will hang together or separately. Heard something like that somewhere.

    • September 3, 2016 at 2:40 pm

      And if all that shiite is not enough, consider what happens to DBD and other sites when the control of the Internet is given to repressive countries. Self-Anointed King plans on it.
      Then for good measure consider this scenario:
      Exclusive: Andrew Thorp King looks ahead to when caliphate is ‘world’s lone superpower’

  • September 3, 2016 at 2:17 pm

    National Review–primarily via Buckley & Whittaker Chambers–is well versed in smearing. See the latter’s review of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged:

    And Buckley’s “thoughts” on AynRand interviewed by Charlie Rose in 2003:

    Trivia: Upon meeting Buckley, AR remarked: “You are too intelligent to believe in a god.”

  • September 3, 2016 at 3:39 pm

    The Lathe of Heaven would be rejected by the Left as not being gray enough

    • September 3, 2016 at 3:51 pm
      Grunt GI

      Wow. You love your classic SyFy references eh?

      Yes it probably would.

      • September 3, 2016 at 5:30 pm

        I’m somewhat of a nerd though I do shoot better than most.

  • September 3, 2016 at 4:31 pm

    DISCLAIMER: I did not read all the comments

    However, I did read the article. At the end he uses the example of Birchers damning Ike as a Commie and the retort – “He’s not a Commie, he’s a golfer.”

    Well, OBozo is a golfer, a Commie and and Islamist.

    Kinda strange that in this setting the Ike reference was made.

    To me that enhances the Stockholm Syndrome reference.

  • September 3, 2016 at 4:32 pm
    Doo-Dah, Doo-Dah

    So, here I am next day, responding to my own prior question of “What really *IS* ‘The Alt-Right’ ?”

    Apparently, from the interesting and illuminating comments/ links above, TPTB {whoever they are} have managed to define “alt-right” as: “White-Christian-Nativist-Paranoid-Racist-Separatists”. Is that about it?

    What about the rest of us (MOST of us, I believe) who distinguish between culture and skin-color? I have no problem with a Thomas Sowell or a Herman Cain, but I think Obama and The Racist Black Revrunds and the Grievance-Mongering Appointees to the DOJ could be done-away-with, to the vast improvement of the nation.

    La Raza Unida and all its members can GO HOME to Mexico (or points further south) and forget about La Reconquista. We are already a nation, we already have a culture that works (if we let it), and we also have a perfectly good Constitution that guarantees the rights and liberties of “us and our posterity” (– if we can elect representatives who will honor their oaths to “preserve, protect, and defend” it, which is getting more and more difficult to do. We might need to make mis- or mal-feasance in office a capital crime, which should focus their attention on their duties instead of on their perks and cronies.)

    I see NO reason to import ANY Muslims whatever, unless they are willing to renounce the Politico-Religious-Supremacist culture of Islam. Let them convert and become Unitarians or some other bland non-proselytizing sect, and then let them immigrate. (If it were up to me, there would be NO mosques permitted here, either. Hotbeds of treason, veritable vipers’ nests, footholds for terror-in-the-heartland. Just, absolutely, NO.)

    So – am I an alt-right-ist yet? There’s a WHOOOLE bunch-o-peeps I wouldn’t allow into my country; but “skin color” or “religion” has nothing to do with who I’d accept. Those who believe in Rule of Law, and who support equality-of-all UNDER the Law, and agree that the Freedom to Criticize and Argue and Be Obnoxious is a positive good (though it may be annoying – there’s yin-and-yang in all things), would be welcome. Those who want The Power Of The State to force some individual baker to make gay cakes, or straight cakes, or crooked cakes, can go elsewhere. Mutually-acceptable transactions should be the norm, and government should be as small as possible. (And government should NOT be in the business of tossing taxpayer money around in an effort to make ANY “playing field” “level”. If we respect the idea of “individual merit”, the various “playing field”s will level themselves spontaneously and fairly quickly, and government can go focus on its “singular and necessary” functions…)

    • September 3, 2016 at 4:59 pm

      Well put.
      The problem is the folks who came up with the moniker intend it to mean “those white separatist dudes with bald heads and swastika tattoos”. Then they apply to all conservatives by virtue of the word “right” in the name.
      I think it’s entirely possible to NOT defend the folks described while still making (and defending) the points that you make. And that’s Jonah’s position, as well. (Based on having read him for 20 years, now.)

      • September 3, 2016 at 6:07 pm
        Grunt GI

        Well, the left is basically ALWAYS going to label ALL conservatives as racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, homophobic puppy eaters…so what?
        I mean I agree with you, I try to judge people not by the content of their skin, but the content of their character, but for the left it’s ALWAYS about tribal identity…and WHITE people are always the root of all evil, especially straight white males….I think enough of us are just saying enough of your crap and they are fighting back like the desperate losers they are with MORE name calling.

      • September 3, 2016 at 7:06 pm

        That’s it, pretty much in a nutshell – whites -especially Christian whites (I’m agnostic, myself) – are who created Western Civilization, which has been enjoyed by all of the various races and cultures (except true muslims) who have emigrated to America, to enjoy its bounty. Now they want to take over that bounty to use as they see fit, while crushing underfoot the white culture, deeming it unacceptable, racist, LGBT-phobic, and deserving of death at the hands of blacks, La Raza punks, and muslim scum who hate us all – not for a damn thing any of us have done, but simply because we aren’t interested in joining islam in its search for universal acceptance of the perversions anointed by mohammed.

        Well, just as the Hawaiians who hate the haole tourists would starve to death without them, those who want to do away with us whites will end up with Castro’s version of failed communism by continuing down that road.

        Diversity is perversity. Assimilation is what has worked for so many years in this country – assimilation into our white (formerly) European culture. If you don’t like it, stay the eff where you came from. Don’t come here and try to change it. And don’t run over the rights of the individual just because you are part of some sick collective.

  • September 3, 2016 at 5:13 pm

    And how to define the ‘Alt-Left’ ?

    • September 3, 2016 at 7:17 pm

      I don’t know how, but I know one when I meet it.

      Read that article above from The Stranger, the author is a pretty good example.

  • September 3, 2016 at 5:35 pm

    For the Debates-No electronic devises for the ears or glasses etc.

    I wouldn’t put it past Hilly’s peeps to read the responses to the asked debate questions for her to parrot.

  • September 3, 2016 at 7:08 pm


    Here is a tool for determining who wins:

    Remember that in order to keep this Nation from going totally into the abyss, We the People must be United in the saving.
    Save the pissing contests for later.
    Debate the subject at hand and please do not descend into being a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Left is counting on it.

    Thank you for your time.

    I’m going to take a shower.

  • September 3, 2016 at 7:18 pm

    “I’m going to take a shower.”

    If we all go take a shower right now, will we be showering together? 🙂

    • September 3, 2016 at 9:09 pm

      Need a time-turner

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 300 0

buy windows 11 pro test ediyorum