theme-sticky-logo-alt
PREVIOUS POST
The New Job.
NEXT POST
Today’s Programs.

27 Comments

  • July 19, 2019 at 12:22 am
    NotYetInACamp

    How logical!
    How true!

    Hm? Let’s wait until the little guy gets out and can tell us his vote.

    REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 12:24 am
    Toxic Deplorable B Woodman

    Yep. Newborns won’t get to vote with the DildoCrats. After all, to the Libtard DildoCrats, they’re just a tumorous clump of cells. Hmmmmmmm…..I guess that description could apply to the DildoCrats too.

    REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 12:27 am
    kadaka

    Minor children are treated like property and largely can still technically be legally sold, presumptively for adoption. So that would essentially be giving slaves a vote.

    But then Demmies have spent many decades fostering dependence and keeping put-down people on the plantation or else, working them for votes, so this is not surprising.

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 2:28 pm

      No, yella-dog dems were kinda the rinos of now…in many ways lib but in other ways not. Very few were ever on plantations except maybe as share-croppers, going back over a hundred and fifty years.

      Those old dogs like my Dad -and me somewhat until about forty years ago- are mostly gone now; dead or gone rino, full prog, or like me had an awakening. Now rinos’ days are numbered too; they are about to have to pick a lane and stay in it because either way the wind blows in the coming election, they will be killed off by one side or the other.

      And most that go or have gone prog will continue to be kept down on the plantation, for given value of “plantation”, up and down the fascist food chain, until our money runs out.

      FWIW I think they know they are up against it and that all of this recent last-ditch full-blown gloves-off out-of-the-closet attack is a final and likely suicidal bid for the control they so covet but see slipping away, and getting as many bodies on their rolls (pay and vote) as soon as possible plays right into that ultimately self-destructing battle plan.

      They are scared. Good. But don’t get complacent. Cornered vermin are vicious. Fight, because the end is in sight. One way or the other.

      REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 1:03 am
    WayneM

    The Dems are looking for that “sweet spot” where their illogical/irrational/anti-western policies are still appealing. I’m kind of shocked the Dems didn’t suggest lowering the age to 12… Perhaps they weren’t didn’t think they could control their pedophile urges if the “voters” were too young?

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 2:21 am
      kadaka

      PinkNews sends out a warning that GOP legislators want to clamp down on child drag shows

      Because the Constitutional right to dress up prepubescents so they can prance provocatively on stage in a bar as admiring patrons toss money shall not be infringed.

      REPLY
      • July 19, 2019 at 8:50 am
        WayneM

        Between “drag kids” and transgender wackiness, the left is losing their collectivist minds.

        For example… the curious case of Dr. Allan M. Josephson was hired in 2003 to lead the University of Louisville’s struggling Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology. His provided such superlative leadership that his supervisor awarded him perfect marks in his 2014, 2015, and 2016 annual reviews… and he is now suing for constructive dismissal after being demoted for the sin of expressing the following professional & expert opinion in 2017…

        “We don’t let them vote, we don’t let them drive — and so we’re going to let them at the age of eight or nine decide that they’re no longer male or female? Unbelievable.”

        https://www.thecollegefix.com/a-professor-was-fired-after-criticizing-transgender-ideology-hes-fighting-back-with-a-lawsuit/

      • July 19, 2019 at 2:34 pm
        NotYetInACamp

        That professor is an obvious blasphemer.
        Let’s dunk him and if he survives, he’s a witch and must be burned.
        If he drowns, then god has judged him.

        Ben Stein was in a movie named Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed
        Of course it was called a propaganda movie by critics. The fact is that those who do not toe the propaganda line in Universities across the world are expelled, for whatever means and reasons are necessary. The result is the Snowflake and Antifa generations.
        And those who believe that a born baby made comfortable, and then gently having their spinal cord snipped at the neck is not infanticide, so Dem governors have explained to us. (The body parts also retain their highest saleable value.)
        My friend from kindergarten class until his death by the first aids wave was always obviously different, but changing him surgically would have likely been an offense against God and God’s created nature. He knew who he was.

    • July 19, 2019 at 3:32 pm
      Henry

      It certainly would have raised a quandary for Madonna.

      https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/madonna-blowjob-hillary-clinton/

      REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 6:22 am
    GWB

    “Newborn”? Or “unborn”?
    Though, yes, in NY and a few other spots, the difference is less than it used to be…….

    REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 6:52 am
    Tagg

    Give pregnant minority mothers two votes, and watch the overnight change in dem abortion positions. At least in election years.

    REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 7:33 am
    eon

    Considering the left’s obsession with “population” going back to Paul Ehrlich, I’ve often wondered if they understand that more abortions among their dependency “client” classes equals;

    1. Fewer reliable D voters in the next generation; and

    2. A smaller tax base to bleed.

    Of course their importation of potential one-party voters from the Second and Third Worlds will help alleviate (1), but they are unlikely to help solve (2).

    Incidentally, as James Burke relates in Connections, (2) is how the Western Roman Empire collapsed in about three generations in the 5th century AD. A bloated bureaucracy, much of it hereditary, demanding more and more taxes from an ever-shrinking population, said shrinkage due to the high taxes meaning people had no money to support their families, resulting in lower birthrates (and thus an ever-smaller tax base) in each succeeding generation.

    Sound familiar?

    clear ether

    eon

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 2:37 pm
      NotYetInACamp

      — demanding more and more taxes from an ever-shrinking population, said shrinkage due to the high taxes meaning people had no money to support their families, resulting in lower birthrates (and thus an ever-smaller tax base) in each succeeding generation. —

      That was part of the intentional genocide against the Western families.
      A proudly publicly stated genocide no less.

      REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 3:35 pm
      Henry

      “2. A smaller tax base to bleed.”

      or

      2a. A smaller dole base to support

      depending on whether or not they become productive human beings… and the numbers are already in.

      REPLY
      • July 19, 2019 at 5:58 pm
        eon

        Since they are working “off the books”, they are not paying income taxes or Social Security up here, so that’s a sunk cost for us.

        Most of what they “produce” gets sent home to their relations as “remittances”, for which I really can’t blame them.

        Of course, the governments (like Mexico’s) that dumped them here to begin with take about a third of that as their mordida, skimmed right off the top. So they have no real motive to do anything about the “immigration problem”, except to dump more people on our side of the border.

        I’d suggest getting a good estimate of how much each country is skimming from those remittances, and subtracting twice that figure from whatever foreign aid we send them in the same fiscal year.

        If they up the skim, go to 3X. If they take it all, cut off their tap entirely.

        The surest way to get a Caudillo’s attention is to hit him in his numbered Swiss (or Lichtenstein) bank account.

        clear ether

        eon

      • July 19, 2019 at 10:47 pm

        Fact is that 1. 2. and 2a. are all correct.

  • July 19, 2019 at 8:23 am
    ken

    They just want that so they can lower the age of consent and stop all this RAPE talk about their usual sex lives.

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 11:46 pm
      kadaka

      While the US has raised minimum age to at least 16, although with many kid-to-kid generally 4-yr spread exemptions, Europe largely remains shockingly low. Democrats have long wanted us to be like Europe, with their relaxed socialized socialist attitudes.

      REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 10:53 am
    Pamela

    Now the Democrats want children to vote. I wonder how many of the 70 Million + aborted Americans would have voted for them if were they allowed to live.
    It all comes down to a Choice.

    REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 11:21 am

    Whites have the lowest birth rate which suits them fine. Blacks and Hispanics are much higher but still are declining. So which group breeds like roaches and will soon take over from Jews as #2? Muslims of course but they are actually undercounted as “religious” questions are not allowed, so we know what they’re hiding don’t we? How long before they are number one? Well that all depends doesn’t it?

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 12:52 pm

      When we have talker here about “replacement voters” the general sense is they are mostly Mexicans pouring across from Mexico, and that has been the case in the past. But now we know a lot more about the countries south of Mexico purging their excess population, not to mention the many from everywhere else in the world who use the idiocy of those who are forcing us to let criminal immigrants to flood in to hide in their midst, and there are many muslims and other enemy infiltrators among them. And talk about replacement voters, for several reasons mostly traceable to the destruction of family and religious values, the blacks who bred quick and voted for freebies are not doing the former so much anymore largely due to the latter but also because they kill each other a lot, before and after birth. So it is they as well as us, who are being replaced. Hispanics still reproduce at a high rate and they definitely want to up their numbers. But muslims can hide so well in our midst, make as many larvae as possible, and are at their core an invasive species feeding on the host until it is dead. Give ’em the vote and drop that age down to 6 or whatever, and they will absolutely have the numbers to overwhelm us in ten years and attain irreversible critical mass in twenty.

      If they are allowed. And by “they” I don’t mean just the invading hordes but those who want and need them to attain their utopia and keep it only for themselves, at least until all the shit runs out and the slaves revolt. So it can’t be allowed. I’d rather conduct my revolt now.

      REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 6:00 pm
      Kafiroon

      Depends?
      Well that is a lot of Shiite in one place.
      They do not play well with others, also.

      Sorry. Couldn’t help it!

      REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 2:47 pm

    Appears to look like I may have to send you more money after all. Where’s the reader base? I thought you were conservatives who believed in paying your bills. You think this is free? Somebody has to pay the artist to post! That’s y’all! And me. I’ve been reading this site for years, and I’ve been paying in EVERY YEAR since I started here. It’s like paying dues at the club you go to. You don’t want the doors to close on that club, do you?

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 3:11 pm

      Saturday is the big day to push it over the bar, so that Sunday can be Funday down at the ranch, with all the other cares put aside.

      Everybody can pay something, even a few bucks, and if you won’t do that, well, you might be a blueneck. (Sorry, Foxworthy).

      REPLY
  • July 19, 2019 at 3:05 pm

    So, China is losing manufacturers by the hundreds due partly to trade leverage by Trump but also due to other internal pressures. They are mostly shipping their low-tech jobs to places like Vietnam, Malaysia, and India. There are some obvious reasons of logistics, but why is it not a viable option to place big manufacturering hubs just south of the US border and let those people make a living there and stay there?

    Could it be that the largesse they can count on on the north side, legal or not, exceeds the living wages from actual productive work?

    REPLY
    • July 19, 2019 at 6:06 pm
      interventor

      China has arrested European business executives to force concessions from their companies. Resulting in foreign executives not traveling to the mainland — residing in Hong Kong. The proposed extradition act from Hong Kong to the mainland threatened those businessmen, plus Chinese protesting the mainland. Which resulted in the recent riots.

      The Unites States, Mexico and Canada trade act (USMCA) negotiated by Trump and in Congress provides for tax concessions for companies in central America. That’s to bring back companies that moved to China from central America.

      REPLY
  • July 21, 2019 at 2:49 pm
    Mykal

    Science has shown that the human brain doesn’t fully finish developing until approximately age 26. So I say *raise* the voting age to 27, maybe even 30 to allow for some experience to be acquired.

    REPLY

LEAVE A REPLY CANCEL REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.daybydaycartoon.com 300 0