So is she suggesting more than one “cook” for everyone?
Chinese character writing — a pointed curve, like a roof, represents a house. A curve like a mouth represents a woman, A roof with a woman represents happiness and contentment. Two women under one roof represents catastrophe.
Don’t blame me, my old history professor, a conservative who knew Russian and Mandarin, told me the story about 50 years ago.
That has been a popular proverb for ages. I like the Irish version: “Two women under one roof, and one of them a REDHEAD!”
Raw envy is the reason, they hate that she has good looks and class that they could never achieve.
And was a successful business woman.
Leaves them all with their failure.
She is tall, beautiful, highly intelligent, speaks six languages and as @ExNuke said, very classy. She outclassed Michele Obama at the inauguration and in the period between election and inauguration. She is classically statuesque and knows how to work a room. I believe she is the most beautiful and possibly the most intelligent First Lady we’ve ever had. She ties Michelle Obama and Eleanor Roosevelt in being 5’11”. That means she is tied for our tallest First Lady.
She is far and away the best dressed First Lady with the possible exception of Jackie Kennedy. She knows how to dress for success, while Michelle Obama looks like a Walmart shopper. Do you remember that horrid, “Eye of Sauron” thing she wore election night? My daughters freaked.
Michelle is probably more athletic than Milania and could doubtless thrash her on a basketball court or a softball diamond.
Melania looks very like a Lithuanian girl I knew well in university. Easily beautiful. Lovely in all ways. Very intelligent. Aware. Caring. Got along with all. Looked good no matter what she was wearing. (Some bad teeth, but what they hey.) Active in campus groups and off campus service. And without looking it for the curves and softness, she was the strongest woman I ever knew. She was great. That European and Viking stock are no pushovers and are not to be messed with or trifled with. They rise to the proper occasion and fit in well across society.
I doubt Mickel could thrash Melania in any way, but we are above and beyond all that. We should let all be who they are within respecting limits. (I’d bet on Melania.)
Or Mud Wrasslin’ . Don’t forget Mud Wrasslin’!
“She outclassed Michele Obama at the inauguration and in the period between election and inauguration.”
Not all that high a bar, actually. My soon-to-be two year old grand daughter does that wearing only a diaper and a T-shirt.
I’d lay odds that Melanie can grow the food on top of cooking it to perfection.
Where as the others will either create batches of indigestion and trips to the hospital, or the morgue if given the chance.
My mother could grow food and was a great cook. Hungarian.
Michelle spearheaded the creation of that disastrous school feeding children worthless tasteless non nutritional garbage program. And then they called that program a great nutritional breakthrough. Maybe half ended in the garbage as unpalatable (That is not able to be eaten for those in Rio Lindo.)
Only half? I heard it was more like 2/3rds to 3/4ths
They hate that the hands-down hands-on hottest First Lady ever is not a peabrained Democrat feminist harpy. They hate that the first supermodel First Lady is the wife of a successful Republican president. They hate that OrangeManBad has had a bevy of beautiful woman (congrats! Commander-in-Chief), unlike a certain macho-less, fake Lightbringer. But mostly regarding Melania, they – Dims of all 27 genders – hate that they can’t bed her.
And the sad thing to all of the Melania vs Michael comparisons above – is that many of them can be learned.
You can’t do much about the appearance you were born with, but you can learn to enhance it with the proper application of light makeup. Leave the trowels in the garden shed.
Ditto for body appearance. Learn to dress well in simple, classic lines and styles, that accentuate in all the right places and minimize all the other places.
Ditto for intelligence. Not everyone can be a genius. Learn as much as you can, so that even if you aren’t able to write a PhD thesis, you can at least make others comfortable so you can converse with them without babbling like an idiot.
And last, not everyone can be a philosopher. But learn to be comfortable with yourself, and everyone around you will be comfortable with you as well.
It’s the peak of winter down in Argentina, poor Jan has to dress warmly. Do they make waterproof iPads? She could get all her work done while in the heated pool, although there may be notable side-effects if she has to get out for too long. 😉
This is the female version of the penis envy in the male world.
No more need b said.
Do they still call themselves feminists? I mean that is so…gender specific. Maybe something like “pansexualist”? That means they don’t know wtf they are, and I sure as hell can’t tell either when I recall those mobs of pussyhatters, and most especially Big Mike.
Pansexual is the functional replacement for bisexual after the scientific discovery there has always been far more than two genders. A pansexual may know what gender they are, or be agender or unspecified, the term refers to they being open to relationships with any gender types, they’re interested in the person. This is in opposition to an asexual (“ace”) who just doesn’t feel sexually attracted to others.
It’s funny how much of what used to be “moods” and “phases” is now enshrined in lifestyle-affirming terminology.
Oh, the current upshot of the Muller hearing, over an hour into it, is Grandad might be beyond coffee. Needs people to speak slowly, repeat questions often, has to keep looking up nearly everything in the bound copy of the report, etc. He really doesn’t seem to know much of his own report. And is doing a lot of “I refer you to the report” and “I don’t know.”
A point of information, if I may. There are three – grammatically speaking – genders: Masculine, Feminine, Neuter. There are two – biologically speaking – sexes: Male, Female (although authentic Androgynes and Hermaphrodites might argue for inclusion.
This prostitution or the English language has been one of my hot buttons since it began. As someone has put it so succinctly: “Pronouns have gender – People have sex!”
Well words do have meaning but that particular blurb misses the point of the other one about the third half of sex being half mental. Or was that baseball? 🙂 Anyway, is there any denying that they are insane?
One thing they are for sure is misandrist…the opening description for misandry on wiki is dead-on and hilarious. Don’t know how that fits into their identity issues but it sure as hell makes them asexual from the male point of view. Just envision Mike or the Beast or any of those protestors naked…on the other hand don’t; speaking of mental issues that could cause you some.
There is no sisterhood. That is only a ploy used to gain personal individual advantage.
“We thank you Mr. Mueller for completely agreeing with us that Congress must immediately fulfill their obligation by immediately beginning formal Impeachment proceedings against this rogue unlawful President even though you were barred from saying anything at all like that which we’ve always said you wanted to say!”
Oh that poor old often-confused man. That Democrat trap was rapid-fire statements trying to trick him into agreeing with what he never said or couldn’t say. Looked like an abusive police interrogation. I felt sorry for him.
I do not feel sorry for him. What I have watched of the hearings are that he was a boob, and he got everything he deserved.
Mueller, at best, is hard of hearing, or suffering from early dementia. Before testifying before the Intelligence committee, changed his testimony before the earlier Judiciary Committee. Mueller stated that Trump couldn’t be indicted for obstruction, not because of DoJ policy. He didn’t go far beyond that. His second statement agrees with his answers to AG Barr during a conference call, earlier. The real reason is the obstruction statute, cited, doesn’t apply (18 USC 1505). Suspect Andrew Weissmann was up to his old tricks of prosecuting non-existent crimes (Merrill Lynch).
Did you see the extended bit at the end of the Intelligence Committee (heh heh) hearing where Schiff threaded Mueller through five minutes of linked hypotheticals trying to make it look like Mueller was saying Trump was guilty of a bunch of things? Painfully pathetic.
His preferred line of inquiry was kinda revealing, wonder if it was related to all that conclusive evidence of Russian collusion he’s been sitting on. “So Trump was all set up to make tons of money from that Moscow Trump Tower, uh huh. He kept talking to Russians about it, right, uh huh. Working on it through the election like Cohen said, uh huh. Said he’d need Kremlin permission, uh huh. Greed makes people betray their country, corrupts everyone, Trump was going to make a lot of money with his Russian Trump Tower, enough to betray his country, right, uh huh. You’d agree with me if you could, we know that’s true, uh huh.”
Watching no neck Nadler, who belts his pants at his nipples. Give him a top hat, a monocle and a cigarette holder and he’s the Penguin.
Mueller’s performance is rather sad. Bad hearing (duty in Nam can do that) , or onset dementia?
The Democrat’s nothing burger has degenerated into a bagel — boiled, baked with a hole poked in it. Served cold without even a smear. Question is, will Democrats proceed with more wild accusations, joined by their Geek chorus, the MSM? Or, will they resort to deploying more of their violent elements.
To go a hair further on my previous comment, an incompetent boob with not the first clue.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Want DBD delivered to your email daily? Sign up here!