Cherry, Popped.


  • June 12, 2021 at 12:12 am

    Sam, mmm that is a fine honey…

    Zed, eww put something on will ya?

    Double standard? Yes but unlike Dims I do have some.

    • June 12, 2021 at 4:26 pm

      I have zero attraction to the male form, but Zed in that panel does indeed embody the best of classic statuary.

  • June 12, 2021 at 12:14 am

    A) Ahh, Friday Night
    B) I will send a paper check, to hell with all these electronic bandits
    C) If you need me, don’t bother, I’ll be in my bunk with the Mrs.

  • June 12, 2021 at 12:29 am

    Talk about your splendor in the grass.

  • June 12, 2021 at 12:30 am

    More like no more babies if a person is still above ground

  • June 12, 2021 at 2:48 am
    Lucius Severus Pertinax

    I prefer to grade Cris’s work on a Curve.

  • June 12, 2021 at 6:59 am
    My Way Or -->

    That’s if you contract the live virus.

    The vaxx is NOTHING BUT pieces of the virus’s MRNA, and NOT the complete virus, and is D-E-A-D, DEAD.

    Unfortunately, this clever LIVE bug has the ability to shift into a new variant, just like the Fl;u Bug in Stephen Kin’gs “The Stand”. Read that when it was first published. Got spooked, because it was possible. King’s imagination is/was limitless. That is the only novel he wrote that spooked me.

    In my view Xi is one sick bastard and that short dork in WDC is worse.

    • June 12, 2021 at 7:41 am

      What I’ve read is the way they wrap in in a lipid with a chemical attachment it does get into the mitochondria and it does rewire you.

  • June 12, 2021 at 8:51 am

    Fear is the destructor and then, killer.
    This thing maybe makes zombies.

  • June 12, 2021 at 8:53 am

    Chris, what you have read is not accurate. The only cells which get “reprogrammed” are the ones which produce antibodies, and they are the parts of your body which shuffle their DNA around all the time. It’s the normal part of getting an immunity. This is my field of expertise, because I work as a biochemist in real life.
    I will say, though, that it’s true that all vaccines have a risk level. You always balance the risk of the vaccine side effects versus the risk of getting the disease itself. With the people who are saying cheerfully “Oh no! There are no side effects at all!” and the people who are saying “This vaccine is more deadly than the disease!” it get’s hard to price out the risk of whether or not to take the vaccine. Too bad most of the top people in my field shot their credibility to hell by ignoring our scientific principles in favor of their own political ones. That pisses me off, as a scientist.

    • June 12, 2021 at 3:14 pm

      DrUrchin, Pure Science, what a concept.

      How sad, how grindingly sickeningly tragic is it that everything out of the mouths and mouthpieces of the “top” scientists, the politicians, their hand-maidens in media, the medical/pharmaceutical establishment, and of course the chi-coms themselves have become so twisted, so politicized, so weaponized that we can’t trust or believe a word of it.

      And I don’t. And I won’t take my medicine like a good obedient sheeple.

      • June 12, 2021 at 4:29 pm

        As conservatives, we champion an existence in which people think for themselves and take responsibility.
        It’s bad that we can’t trust a damn thing that our “leaders” and our “explainers” tell us, but if it’s kicking us headlong into a new society in which fewer of us are content to be sheep, it’s not all bad.

      • June 13, 2021 at 6:14 pm

        The nice thing about being American is that I don’t have to impose my opinion on you. I think I’m right, but your CHOICE to do what you please is more important than my opinion. God I love this country.

    • June 12, 2021 at 5:51 pm

      It should piss you off.
      I have seen less ‘science’, as the left calls it, recently. Yet they always seem to assert the ‘science.’
      People do not have a valid unbiased public source of information on which to base their personal assessment of the risks and/or benefits involved in taking or avoiding the mRNA jab. The jab is still experimental, if I recall its emergency use approval.
      Doctors are forced into only being able to offer the jab. That b government and health care provider regulations. I asked for Ivermectin citing various successful usage results. Denied.

      Pushing further out.
      On the legal front that is possibly being intentionally ignored, there was the matter of results at Nuremberg. No experimental treatments, drugs, or procedures can be forced on anyone. (That’s why so many colleges students seem a bit off after taking experimental drugs for proving tests. That’s a joke. I think) And the US Government regulations include no consequences for refusing any experimental procedures, vaccinations or drugs.
      I wonder if law-fare should be pursued against all discrimination against those not jabbed, and for not permitting such seemingly successful of use drugs such as Invermectin published by foreign nations and doctors. The government had to declare there were no safe alternatives to the ‘jabs’ in order to give emergency approval to the ‘jabs.’
      In the speculating area, there may be lawsuits available to those discriminated against due to not taking their ‘jabs.’ It is a still not developed area. Pharma is absolved of all liability concerning those who were ‘jabbed.’ Employers may be liable for damages due to injuries to those the employer requires people to get as part of employment. Refusing access is a area not developed either. In NYC the vax jab proof is said to be required to enter public parks and other areas.
      Infectious disease protocols going back millennia have been rejected for the vax or nothing protocol. Reduction of flu like symptoms were rejected for let their infection progress, and such symptom control means such as Ivermecton and others were reject, with a possible higher death rate.
      This response has been a clusterforked or agenda driven actions by many appearances.
      Science looks to have had too little to do with the entire Covid19 response. Truth. That is an unknown word in many places these days. That is why telling it and standing for it as far as one is able has importance. And especially spread truth far when there is no bad consequence.

  • June 12, 2021 at 10:27 am

    Dr. Urchin,

    Your thoughts on immunity from acquiring and surviving the ChiComWe flu virus?

    I had a case of it in January 2020, from all of the described symptoms. I survived.

    The research I have looked at is at about a 60-40 divide about whether or not the vaccine is contraindicated.

    • June 13, 2021 at 6:18 pm

      Hardthought, I don’t want to stray too far out of my area of expertise. I do protein engineering at the DNA level (which is **not** the same as this gain-of-function garbage). A real medical doctor might have a better opinion than mine. That said, my instinct is that you would have more immunity to the newer strains if you were vaccinated, but probably already have a lot of resistance. If everyone around you was vaccinated, then it would not make any difference to you if you were or were not. There will be side effects including pain, nausea, and a fever that could last several days. That is what some people I know experienced. They (like you) had COVID before they called it that, then got vaccinated. I’d be on the 60% side of saying you should, if you have no other health problems. But that 40% side is a big hole. Sorry I can’t say more certainly.

  • June 12, 2021 at 11:15 am
    Chris Muir

    I have great readers!

    • June 12, 2021 at 1:17 pm

      because you’ve earned it

    • June 12, 2021 at 2:21 pm

      Send me your address and I will send a check-

      • June 12, 2021 at 5:32 pm
        Chris Muir

        Monday, Fundraiser will be up, ah sweah!

  • June 12, 2021 at 2:20 pm

    Most of the babble in the Media or on the net is “theory”, “concept”, and/or “propaganda”. There is little actual evidence of what happens with the RNA-based “immunizations”. It is a nice concept, but the trash cans are full of nice concepts that didn’t work out. The “jab” seems to be low risk but for most people, and low benefit. Work it out with your doc.

    “Blood Clot” is a propaganda terror word. The virus and possibly free “spike” protein (if it actually is free-floating) bind to the ACE2 receptor/enzyme which is involved in regulation of blood flow and, thus, blood pressure. Over constriction od blood vessels, rather than clots, may be a problem. Talk to your doc. Don’t build you reality with Media babble.

    For now, my “comorbidities” have been well controlled except for age, and I am fighting the insurance company about the cute redhead that I have on order to counter that problem. It is “Life or Death!”

    Act like a grown up, and talk to your doc. Mostly, if it is in the media, it is trash.
    “War” and “blood” sell the product, truth is irrelevant.

  • June 12, 2021 at 3:41 pm

    Way too much info both pro and anti jab, confuses folks. Lead this fellow to drink, luckily he got help:

  • June 12, 2021 at 5:41 pm

    My wife and I have lived like normal and only wear masks when we are forced to at some stores. For reasons, she and medical need children she works with have been blood tested for covid numerous time though2020 and 2021. All tests for covid have been negative. Numbers we have read about seem to pretty much agree that the survival of the chinese crud is about 99.7%. We are not about to risk the absolute nasty stuff being reported by people after having the shots. Guillain-Barré syndrome and do you know what blood clots can do to you? Now we have teenagers getting blood clots after getting the shots because schools demand it. 5,888 deaths, 1.79% out of 299.1 Million vaccine doses as of June 4th. 23% died within 48 hrs.
    16% within 24 hrs. Or 39% within 48 hrs. 98% anaphylactic shock reactions to Pfizer in 12-17 year olds. MEH. I am Not taking it.

  • June 12, 2021 at 10:20 pm


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 300 0