Men & Women ← Previous post Next post → Comments Deplorable B Woodman Jan 08 2018 at 12:12 am “Believe all women”? My apologies to Sam, but I stopped believing all women before Hellary and Pelousy became political power whores. Now I take it on a case by case basis. Sorry, Sam. cmblake6 Jan 08 2018 at 12:13 am This, while a bit strange, is entirely too possible in the future. Deplorable B Woodman Jan 08 2018 at 12:13 am “Molest the lawnmower”. Now that’s just plain funny, I don’t care who you are. Pamela Jan 08 2018 at 12:43 am Eh hem! What form of birth control did the Bad Boy use in his alleged dalliance with the Lawn Mower? Oh the calamity of it all! The Children! Think of the Children! Kafiroon Jan 08 2018 at 12:57 am The birth control was when it got between the coil and the spark plug. Lit up any fuses it may have had, Bill M Jan 08 2018 at 1:23 am Are the children Weed Whackers or Hedge Trimmers? Demented ones at that. MasterDiver Jan 08 2018 at 8:07 am It’s not my fault! She flirted with me. Every time I walked by she’d rev her engine Then she’d suggestively lift her skirt. Finally, she asked if I would like to do “a little sparking”. And then…and then… Zar Belk! Epador Jan 08 2018 at 12:13 am The icy reply generally drops your testosterone level 75%. Peregrine John Jan 08 2018 at 11:47 am Naw, just reveals if it had previously done so. JTC Jan 08 2018 at 1:12 am None of those “women” and none of those “men” have a damn thing to do with Zed ‘n Red or Me ‘n Mine. Unless we let it. And then they will have won. Because this whole damn thing and all the other “movements” (I like that term because they’re nothing but shit) are designed to emasculate the men and neuter the warriors to make it easy for them (whoever/whatever they may be) to take over without a fight. I will continue to believe and protect and provide for *my* woman and suggest all deplorables do the same, and treat this shit for what it is. Halley Jan 08 2018 at 5:32 am And speaking of ulterior motives, one can be forgiven for suspecting that a large percentage (how near 200% is anyone’s guess) of the MeTooers are actually just women who don’t like sex, or at least, sex with men. Or who – alternatively – are jealous that the better-looking ones get “harassed” more often. Not accusin´, just sayin´.. In any event, “neuter the warriors” has always been a core goal of feminism, for the very reason you give, so any “concerns” by these tools of the Left must be regarded in that light. eon Jan 08 2018 at 8:29 am Don’t forget the ones who willingly jumped on the “casting couch” to perform the time-“honored” (?) Hollywood (and D.C.) ritual of “sleeping their way to the top”. And who now see an opportunity to get both payback and possibly even another $payday$. As my mother always used to say, it takes two to tango. And despise them or not, the old “scandal sheet” tabloids had a pretty good bead on the goings-on behind the scenes in Tinseltown and D.C. both. I doubt any of this would surprise their writers, who despised as “scandal-mongers” or not, were at least real, honest-to-God reporters, not political ideologues with axes to grind. clear ether eon JTC Jan 08 2018 at 1:29 pm @Halley, “tools of the Leftists” is exactly right. As you said the envious hatred and as eon referenced the whore-mongering, have always been. Same as I said with the other “movements”…addicted to attention and whatever they can bilk from “society”. But the more recent and dangerous difference is the weaponizing of these groups by the true dark side, using them to obstruct and destruct all that are not them, pretending to have the interests of the victimhood at heart. And let us not overlook their two overarching goals, unfettered immigration to replenish their pools of fools, their armies of intifada, and disarming us who can prevent it and them from their true goal. “Judgement Day” may be fast approaching. Calvin Jan 08 2018 at 1:13 am And now Milano (or was it Rose McGowan?) has allied herself with a fascist, anti-Semitic, hate monger named Sarsour. JackDeth 72 Jan 08 2018 at 1:23 am That would be Alyssa Milano, Calvin. JSStryker Jan 08 2018 at 1:26 am You left out sexual assault facilitator. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/12/17/linda-sarsour-accused-enabling-sexual-assault-harassment-in-workplace.html JackDeth 72 Jan 08 2018 at 1:24 am Zed may be sleeping on the couch. or in The Dog House, tonight. Pamela Jan 08 2018 at 1:30 pm So when does the makeup sex happen… WayneM Jan 08 2018 at 1:58 pm If I had a choice between makeup sex and getting busy with nothing but positive emotions, that’s an easy one. I was married to a high functioning sociopath for two decades so I’m far too familiar with makeup sex. I’m currently in a relationship with a wonderful woman and, six months in, we’ve yet to have a conflict sufficiently elevated to be called a fight. Amazing to have a relationship with a mature intellectual emotionally stable woman. I could get used to this. Back when I had to mow a level acre property, the lawn tractor was my best friend but I never felt any urge to peek under her skirt. Clearly Z-100 is a better manbot than me… Dread Jan 08 2018 at 1:58 am Whatever! JAK Jan 08 2018 at 3:14 am Hey Eppy, It may not drop the level but it sure levels the delivery system JAK Jan 08 2018 at 3:17 am I’d side with Sam over the tin can any time. GWB Jan 08 2018 at 7:34 am I have to agree with this. Until the tin can looks like Sam, and can think like Sam. . . . Nah, even then I’d take Sam. antares Jan 08 2018 at 3:40 am Judgment has only one ‘e’. Henry Jan 08 2018 at 4:38 am Yes, and for no good reason I can see. We don’t write casment, statment, incitment, or abatment. Who makes up this c**p. Unca Walt Jan 08 2018 at 11:40 am Most dictionaries say both are acceptable. I hope you will be a good neighbour and not turn the colour of aluminium. JTC Jan 08 2018 at 1:42 pm Or debatment…but that’s debatable. 😉 Rule one: There are no rules. Interventor Jan 08 2018 at 12:19 pm Brits use two. Daniel Allen Butler Jan 08 2018 at 4:21 pm “Judgment has only one ‘e’.” Not if you speak English…. Coffee Mug Jan 08 2018 at 6:53 am Henry > Privileged Patriarchs? LOLOL Olddog Jan 08 2018 at 7:39 am “Believe all women.” Unless, of course, they are accusing Bill. eon Jan 08 2018 at 8:32 am Well, there you run into the Clinton Omerta. There’s a fine line between truth and Arkancide in that area. clear ether eon JTC Jan 08 2018 at 11:49 am Yes please! https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/sources-oprah-winfrey-actively-thinking-about-running-for-president/ar-BBI5zFn?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=spartandhp Roland Deschain Jan 08 2018 at 12:58 pm Not another “O”. We cannot afford that! JTC Jan 08 2018 at 1:34 pm “O” yes we can! JTC Jan 08 2018 at 2:05 pm Even better, at the suggestion of that bastion of political knowledge and rhetoric Sarah Silverman: Oprah/Michelle Yeah baby! Kafiroon Jan 08 2018 at 7:30 pm Dumb and Dumber. Did I say that? Must have been my “smart” phone. NotYetInACamp Jan 08 2018 at 8:32 pm Lawn mowers will lift their skirts for the only powerful manbots around. By scientific reports somewhere, I recall that pre 900 mitochondria DNA and DNA revealed that all of the pre-Finnish men in Finland all dissapeared. Died, I suppose. The replacements carried on. The women carried on and lifted them for the new man in town. The ones in power. Survival is a very feminine trait. Just plug in the new part and say it loves you. Was it molestation? She said. He said. She said … He said She said. He said. Somewhere truth might reveal itself. Maybe in a rotary way. (Germany and Sweden 2020 anyone? Certainly not The Visegrad Group.