theme-sticky-logo-alt
PREVIOUS POST
Lebensraum.
NEXT POST
Cycles.

12 Comments

  • September 25, 2026 at 3:46 am
    Henry

    As long as you’re talking about “allies,” have you ever considered this?

    Today, on the left, “allies” means approved supporters of some intersectional darling, such as blacks or queers, who do not themselves belong to the darling group.
    Here’s how all allies are supposed to behave, according to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Action Network:

    “It is never an ally’s place to speak for an oppressed group, but rather to amplify the voices of the oppressed.
    Ideally, [the ally] would have asked us what we thought, or let us speak first.
    As a cisgender heterosexual he has never experienced oppression based on his sexuality or gender identity/expression, and therefore can not define what oppression is.
    His role as an ally is to use his privilege to raise our voices…
    …[A]ll allies… must take a step back and realize that in discussions about queer issues, they must speak with us and not for us.”

    To paraphrase:
    Allies work for us.
    They never speak for us unless we call on them first.
    They don’t decide what our goals are, we tell them and they must follow what we say.
    Their job is strictly to use their abilities and assets to promote and benefit a group to which none of them belong.

    Now, replace the word “ally” with the word “slave.” Those rules precisely fit what was expected of black slaves by their owners.

    Reember this next time someone asks you to be an “ally.”

    REPLY
    • September 25, 2026 at 11:19 am
      hardthought

      Keerect, sir.

      REPLY
    • September 25, 2026 at 5:02 pm
      PeregrineJohn

      Yep. By “ally” they mean “servant,” if not “slave.”

      They could use a dictionary, a kick in the shins, and severe ridicule.

      REPLY
  • September 25, 2026 at 3:48 am
    pyrodice

    And now it’s time to stop following SO many types of “Orders”…

    REPLY
    • September 25, 2026 at 7:18 am
      badger52

      Yes. Covid – what a marvelous social compliance experiment.

      REPLY
      • September 25, 2026 at 10:39 am
        Saaruuk

        Yes…that’s EXACTLY what it was…..an exercise in COMPLIANCE and CONTROL..nothing else!! The masks were the very same as the yellow stars the Jews were forced to wear to more easily ID them in WWII. Those who occasionally went unmasked were ‘noted’ for future reference as “potentially problematic”…..and this most definitely included yours truly!!

        People need to learn that there are only 3 ‘levers’ the gub-mint has to threaten you with.

        1) Your liberty. “Do as we say or we’ll lock you up.”

        2) Your wealth / finances. “Do as we say or we’ll take every penny/make your life too financially difficult to continue.

        And the BIGGEST AND MOST EFFECTIVE lever of them all….

        3) YOUR HEALTH! “Do as we say or you’ll die of some horrible disease.” (probably one we created, or allowed to ‘escape’)

        But, as usual, the Left went totally bat-shit crazy with their newly acquired authority in the “Emergency Powers” Covid granted them. This was most spectacularly demonstrated in blue state with extended closures of schools, limiting occupation of stores, being forced to stay in your homes or face arrest, the “6ft spacing rule”….and how about that one gentleman in Kommifornya that was ARRESTED WHILE WALKING ON AN EMPTY BEACH W/O A MASK!!!

        Thankfully, all the bullshit and chicanery that was exposed during the “SCAMDEMIC” has wised up a goodly portion of the US populace that any more health “scares” are going to be looked at with a VERY skeptical eye!!

      • September 25, 2026 at 11:15 am
        Oldarmourer

        Just a hint of what’s coming from the liebrals when they have enough power…for our own good of course…as usual

      • September 25, 2026 at 9:46 pm
        Henry

        “there are only 3 ‘levers’ the gub-mint has to threaten you with.”
        And it just so happens if you re-order those three, they are identical to a much older formula:
        “Life, liberty, and property.”
        Exactly the three things governments are supposed to PROTECT, not threaten you with.

  • September 25, 2026 at 12:51 pm
    Kafiroon

    They have been claiming they want to kill anyone not doing what they demand “…for our own good of course…”
    Thanks Oa.

    REPLY
  • September 25, 2026 at 7:09 pm
    Steve+Peterson

    “elites” do as we say!!!
    If we want your opinion we will give it to you!!!!!

    REPLY
    • September 25, 2026 at 10:36 pm
      Heltau

      should be, We will beat it out of you.

      REPLY
  • September 25, 2026 at 7:53 pm
    cb

    Different time… same old same old –

    Harry Truman, in his 1951 State of the Union address, said that Soviet communism was trying to make nations into colonies and “use their people as cannon fodder” in wars of conquest.

    REPLY

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.daybydaycartoon.com 300 0