theme-sticky-logo-alt
PREVIOUS POST
Da Vision.
NEXT POST
Darwined.

39 Comments

  • December 6, 2018 at 12:13 am
    Delilah T

    Pep talks do work.

    REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 12:17 am
    Pamela

    Careful sitting down Mr. President and anyone tries kicking will will find their toes crushed.

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 12:12 pm

      “Careful sitting down Mr. President…”

      If what I think is true is true…it’s his own toes in danger. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Talk about some big ones!

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 12:40 am
    Deplorable B Woodman

    Brass? Or steel?

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 1:47 am

      Damnit, you stole my line! ๐Ÿ˜›

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 2:00 am
      interventor

      Adamantium, with an Ubobtainium wash.

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 2:00 am
      Too Tall

      I’m thinking Titanium, or maybe Unobtainium.

      In Texas, is it “Huevos” or “Cojones.”

      Isn’t “Clang, Clang…” the intro to “Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead?”

      REPLY
      • December 6, 2018 at 11:21 am
        Old Codger

        In Texas either one is acceptable. Most of the time what I’ve heard is “cojones” but I have heard ’em referred to as “huevos” but “cojones” it more common.

  • December 6, 2018 at 12:53 am

    Big brass ones.

    And “has”, not “had”.

    REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 12:57 am
    Spin Drift

    Don’t bells also clang? “White Squall”

    Spin
    WWG1WGA

    REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 1:03 am
    NotYetInACamp

    The Brass is back.

    REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 1:16 am
    formwiz

    I don’t think Trump needs any pep talks.

    I also think he knows what he has to do. Right now he’s winning on almost every front.

    REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 1:30 am
    Fronk!

    Cajones… What a concept!

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 1:49 am

      Especially in “the swamp”.

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 1:49 am

    I just want to see those things put into full blown operation!

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 12:07 pm

      Dude. Ew.

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 5:02 pm
      kadaka

      Avenatti would’ve released the tape by now if there was one.

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 3:32 am
    Pete 231

    The last frame shows three clang notes… Could it be that DJT, in addition to the standard load, is packing a spare third nard ? That would explain why a lot of boot-lickers lately are backing down from him…..

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 4:12 am
      Punta Gorda

      Tres Hombres?

      Great Album.

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 7:57 am
      MasterDiver

      That “Little Something Extra”!
      Zar Belk!

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 9:28 am
      PaulS

      The three amigos! ๐Ÿ™‚

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 10:44 am
      John D. Egbert

      Let’s hear it for lagniappe . . .

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 6:34 am
    eon

    Incidentally, if you want to read a brutal smackdown of the Deep State, the Democrats, and the left in general;

    https://spectator.us/camille-paglia-hillary-trump/

    Yes, I know who it is, but this is one traditional liberal who is righteously pissed at her own political party. And what she has to say about President Trump, “deplorables”, and academia might surprise you.

    clear ether

    eon

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 7:35 am
      Browncoat

      Camille Paglia is just short of ‘right’. She has been dissing on the Democrats since Obama got appointed…

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 8:58 am
      Delilah T

      Thanks for the link, eon. She’s repeating what the rest of us know and recognize instinctively.

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 12:08 pm
    Brad

    She uses a lot of high-highfalutin words to say basically simple things. Pretty much all of what are called conservatives today could have happily been members of the Democrat Party of the thirties and forties. Paglia longs for the Democrat party of the fifties and sixties. There isn’t gonna be a return to the values of the past in either the GOP or the current DemoCRAP Party. The only way there will ever again be a major political party with a decent platform of philosophies is if a new one emerges to REPLACE one of the current ones. America will never have more than two major political parties. Right now it basically has ONE pro-globalist pro-OneWorldGovernment uniparty with two branches.

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 1:01 pm

      This.

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 2:03 pm
      Halley

      Memory lane – back in the 90s Camille, bless her heart, helped me transition away from PC, and I devoured everything she wrote. But take a look at her voting record: OMG!!! 100% socialist/kooky-green/anti-American. She doesn’t practice what she preaches, which – regardless of her blazing insights into the arts and artists – makes it impossible for me to take her seriously anymore. She wants the criminal Dims in power – sorry, Camille, that’s unforgivable under any rationale.

      And by the way – are there people in the White House reading DBD?

      REPLY
      • December 6, 2018 at 11:04 pm
        Delilah T

        Paglia voted for Sanders, yes, but that took votes away from Clinton. In the general election, he received 6% of the vote in Vermont.
        The Bernie or Bust movement is often cited as one of the contributing factors in Hillary Clinton’s loss in the general election.
        Without his interference (even though he appeared to support her), things might have gone a different route.
        Would you rather have had Clinton declared the winner in 2016?

    • December 6, 2018 at 2:29 pm
      gruundehn

      The Duopoly has rules in place that prevent any serious effort to replace either from succeeding. To change the rules, a Third Party (Libertarians anyone?) must win and the Duopoly works hard to prevent that.

      I mention the Libertarians not only because I am an officer thereof, but because just about anyone here will agree with the Libertarian Party on at least one major issue. Moreso probably than any other party.

      REPLY
      • December 6, 2018 at 4:14 pm

        Well Iโ€™m down with libertarianism just not Libertarianism, also independent but not Independent… funny how thatโ€™s kind of redundant.

      • December 6, 2018 at 4:52 pm
        John

        As a Libertarian myself I see a major flaw in our party ascending to prominence.
        The simple lack of, and indeed avoidance of, the teaching of old fashioned Rhetoric in our schools from junior high on.
        Of course the lack of said training was what allowed DJT to blindside the UniParty, but the presence of said training would have prevented this mess to begin with.

  • December 6, 2018 at 1:38 pm
    kadaka

    Is it high brass or low brass? Although I might’ve read that’s not as important when it’s time to shoot as the wad.

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 10:41 pm
      Deplorable B Woodman

      I see what you did there.
      And I applaud! Well played!

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 3:18 pm

    The leftocracy has made the Dim party irrelevant for forty years,
    and DJT made the Rino party irrelevant in 2016 and beyond.

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 4:09 pm

      Wonder if calling it party-fluid would attract some signallers? ๐Ÿ™‚

      REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 5:03 pm
      John

      The rise of the illiberal SJW religion (and make no mistake, it is one) has effectively split the Left, and the more effective they become the wider the split.
      There is a great deal of room for Liberals on the Right, strangely enough, because of their respect for the Individual.
      The real test will be who can unite the Right enough to actually consolidate and use the power to roll back the State and reinstate the Individual as a political force. A conservative SCOTUS is only a first step.

      REPLY
  • December 6, 2018 at 5:39 pm
    Brad

    A conservative SCOTUS won’t CAUSE anything to happen. It simply won’t ALLOW some things to happen. The closest it could come to CAUSING any change would be if challenges to already existing government overstepping were brought before it. I don’t expect to see that happen.

    REPLY
    • December 6, 2018 at 11:01 pm
      interventor

      SCOTUS may only challenge overstepping of existing government actions, if such are dragged before it and presented. Such is the necessary nature of the beast. Its not a secondary legislature.

      REPLY

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.daybydaycartoon.com 300 0