It’s not just dems that are right at home in the mire of the swamp. The entire uni party enjoys the muck while pretending like ber rabbit to be horrified. They play a role of resistance to fool the public into believing that our former republic actually still hangs by a thread. Our republic may can be RESTORED, but what is already lost can’t be saved. RINOs, the formerly secret pawns of the dems must go!
As a Canadian, I don’t completely understand the civic process so hopefully someone can explain this.
Jeffries and other top Demoncrats keep threatening to raise the number of Supreme Court justices and pack SCotUS with young activist judges to tilt the Courts in the favour of Dems. It’s as simple as a bill in Congress to change the number, right?
I’m of the opinion adding more justices would dilute the legitimacy of SCotUS. Nine Justices is probably too many. Seven might be better. If I understand the process correctly, the only way to ensure the SCotUS doesn’t get expanded is to amend the Constitution, capping the number.
Is that correct? And if so, why hasn’t anyone done it??
@ WayneM
That’s basically it.
And the reason no one has made any move towards a Constitutional Amendment to permanently cap the number is that during a Constitutional Convention everything is up for grabs.
Repeal of the 2nd A, or any other Amendment.
Any other issue as a new Amendment, for good or ill; term limits or basic income.
We can amend the constitution without a full-blown constitutional convention. The problem is that you need a 2/3 majority vote in both the house and senate to even propose it. Then you need 3/4 of the states to agree.
May 21, 2026 at 11:58 am
Oldarmourer
For the same reason the SCOC justices are hand appointed by the PM with no vetting or recourse by anyone else, they need someone to rubber stamp their larceny and dictatorship, and if they don’t get it then they want to change the system until they do. At least there’s an age limit for SC judges up here, but the liebrals pick ’em young for the longest shelf life, exprience or competence are irrelevant as long as they do what they were appointed to.
Well the demons have loudly from multiple voices told us what they are going to do to us if they win the midterms.
As long as I can remember politics, say the Korean War period, we have Always had do nothing, hug a demonrat, republicans. When have we ever not gained new ones to replace those we might have gotten rid of?
Why do repulican appointed Supreme Court Justices seem to favor democrat leanings/voting? Revolution seems to be the basic government change. And then next despot/tyrant, or rigged voting group.
13 Comments
Anything they haven’t done?
That would be,
“Never openly admit what they dream of doing.”
The result would make the U.S. look like the USSR.
And every major city look like the first five minutes of The Crow (1994).
Every night.
Forever.
clear ether
eon
Some Democrats seem to be willing to say it out loud. And WE had better listen and be ready!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/elections/hakeem-jeffries-shredded-over-disgustingly-violent-call-for-dems-to-break-spirit-of-maga/ar-AA23B9Zi?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Zar Belk!
Only RINOs can break the spirit of MAGA.
All Dem opposition just makes us stronger.
“34 felony convictions” my ass.
It’s not just dems that are right at home in the mire of the swamp. The entire uni party enjoys the muck while pretending like ber rabbit to be horrified. They play a role of resistance to fool the public into believing that our former republic actually still hangs by a thread. Our republic may can be RESTORED, but what is already lost can’t be saved. RINOs, the formerly secret pawns of the dems must go!
Very accurate, and very well said.
R’s and D’s are almost meaningless, much as it was in the 1860’s under the First Rino. Everything that goes around…
Offered without comment.
https://appalachianrenegade.com/2026/05/20/violence/
I’m surprised that the Capital Building isn’t a particular color of brown.
Since it is filed to the top of the dome with it.
As a Canadian, I don’t completely understand the civic process so hopefully someone can explain this.
Jeffries and other top Demoncrats keep threatening to raise the number of Supreme Court justices and pack SCotUS with young activist judges to tilt the Courts in the favour of Dems. It’s as simple as a bill in Congress to change the number, right?
I’m of the opinion adding more justices would dilute the legitimacy of SCotUS. Nine Justices is probably too many. Seven might be better. If I understand the process correctly, the only way to ensure the SCotUS doesn’t get expanded is to amend the Constitution, capping the number.
Is that correct? And if so, why hasn’t anyone done it??
@ WayneM
That’s basically it.
And the reason no one has made any move towards a Constitutional Amendment to permanently cap the number is that during a Constitutional Convention everything is up for grabs.
Repeal of the 2nd A, or any other Amendment.
Any other issue as a new Amendment, for good or ill; term limits or basic income.
No one wants to risk it…yet.
We can amend the constitution without a full-blown constitutional convention. The problem is that you need a 2/3 majority vote in both the house and senate to even propose it. Then you need 3/4 of the states to agree.
For the same reason the SCOC justices are hand appointed by the PM with no vetting or recourse by anyone else, they need someone to rubber stamp their larceny and dictatorship, and if they don’t get it then they want to change the system until they do. At least there’s an age limit for SC judges up here, but the liebrals pick ’em young for the longest shelf life, exprience or competence are irrelevant as long as they do what they were appointed to.
Well the demons have loudly from multiple voices told us what they are going to do to us if they win the midterms.
As long as I can remember politics, say the Korean War period, we have Always had do nothing, hug a demonrat, republicans. When have we ever not gained new ones to replace those we might have gotten rid of?
Why do repulican appointed Supreme Court Justices seem to favor democrat leanings/voting? Revolution seems to be the basic government change. And then next despot/tyrant, or rigged voting group.