Horror Show.


  • June 11, 2016 at 10:44 pm
    Charles Newton

    BWAHAHAHAHAH! Priceless!

    • June 12, 2016 at 8:46 am
      Unca Walt

      I’ve been a Chris Muir fan for years.

      This is the first time I actually let out a huge whoop of laughter. I laughed so hard, tears ran down my leg.

      Chris… HOW do you think up these wonderful things? 🙂

  • June 11, 2016 at 10:53 pm
    Delilah T.

    Oh, I DO wish, CM. I DO!

  • June 11, 2016 at 11:01 pm

    Chris,How can I buy a print/lithograph/original of frame 2.
    With Sam in shorts, with that smile,and a Shiner bottle?

    You could sell this shit as art ,you know.

  • June 11, 2016 at 11:16 pm

    Terminators are so cliche. Why not Toasters! LOL!

  • June 11, 2016 at 11:40 pm

    Once government has a monopoly of force, exactly how soon the massacres begin depends solely on the whims of the rulers.

    Factors affecting this include their degree of paranoia, their level of megalomania, their exact set of delusions, their vision of Utopia, and how easily they become bored and jaded with the usual run of orgies, excesses, and perversions.

    Simply put, the only thing more dangerous that a rictus-grinning freak screaming “DIEKILLYOUALLMAKEYOUSUFFERDIEDIEDIEDIEDIEDIE!!”, or a monomaniac with a self-defined “mission” to “Make Everything Perfect Forever”…

    Is a bored aesthete who decides to kill you, your family, and 235,794 other people chosen at random because he can’t think of anything else more “interesting” to do.

    clear ether


    • June 11, 2016 at 11:57 pm

      Ask not for whom Kyrstallnacht comes, it comes for thee…

      (And particularly the compliant politicians, RINOs first)

      clear ether

      • June 12, 2016 at 5:35 am
        Bill G

        Yes, the useful idiots never learn that they are among the first to go to the wall.
        Once the maximum ruler is seated and does not deliver on his promises they question, and that’s it for them.

  • June 11, 2016 at 11:52 pm

    I wonder if Shiny there use sex wax for lubricant…

  • June 12, 2016 at 1:00 am

    Couple edits.

    “The left…will not stop until you are dead.”

    Or until they are.

    “They don’t feel…remorse, or fear.”

    I’m guessing the ones in that van are feeling quite a bit of both right now.

    • June 12, 2016 at 2:00 am

      Fear? Certainly. Remorse? Unlikely.

      • June 12, 2016 at 9:56 am

        Oh you can bet they’re feeling some serious short-term remorse. As in, “Man, I wish the F–K I hadn’t (put on this uniform/climbed in this van/picked up these invaders) today!”

        As for long-term? I dunno. I know and have had pretty deep discussions with a lot of LEO’s, from town, to county, to state levels and from street to undercover to mid and top administration. I can count on one hand the ones who felt this republic and this culture was headed in the right direction the last few decades, and as that encompasses most of their careers I think there’s a shit-ton of them who genuinely regret their career choice and have serious remorse for what their jobs entail, now just trying to make it to 20 or 25 years and their pension. Further, MANY of them would be on the side of Right if it should come to armed insurrection, whether still on active duty or not.

        Fed level, I just can’t say, I’ve had almost no interactions with them. But you would have to think that there are a lot more who took a job expecting certain ideals and have been woefully disappointed in the directives that come down from on high. And I think an awful lot of them, too, would side with real Americans when push comes to shove comes to armed conflict. That would leave the elites and those afflicted with various pop-psych afflictions, and maybe a contingent of castle guards going up against very formidable odds.

        So, remorse? Yeah, I think there’s quite a lot of it…short-term, long-term, philosophical, and downright visceral. Hence the Trump Train. Wherever it may go, and it might be just a big circle, the power of that “Preference Cascade” is undeniable, and I think unextinguishable.

      • June 12, 2016 at 10:09 am

        Dang, when I said no fed-level interaction I forgot about BATFE! That has been a mixed bag and quite an evolving experience. For the first 25 years I was a merchant of death (FFL) I had just two on-site premises and inventory inspections, and a handful of telephone inquiries, I always attributed that to keeping on top of my responsibilities and requirements even when I felt gov had little or no business being involved. That all changed after 9/11 when suddenly all gun shops started being eyed as potential armorers of domestic tango’s. And that doubled down under Bobo, with more us/them adversarial attitude than the very cooperative relationships that I had always enjoyed. But now even that has waned quite a bit, as those guys are free Americans too, and they have come to see that the only ones penalized by hard-ass and gotcha! policies are the good guys who are doing the right thing and helping the patriots prepare for the worst. And they have come to realize too I think, that their own hierarchal system has done more to help and arm potential evil-doers than all the gun dealers in the land. So there might be quite a bit of ship-jumping there too…who knows how prevalent that propensity would be among other fed-gov letter agencies…but as I indicated above, I think it would/will be YUGE.

  • June 12, 2016 at 1:11 am

    And this, boys and girls, is the sort of thing WE must do.”People should not fear their government, government should fear their people”.

    • June 12, 2016 at 1:50 am

      Absolutely. I think civilians should be able to own functional surplus tanks, cannon, and et cetera. During the Revolutionary War, a good portion of the cannon the Rebel Armies used was donated by private citizens who owned it as a matter of course. Such weapons were effectively outlawed in the 30s because the government didn’t want to be afraid of that kind of rebellion.

      • June 12, 2016 at 7:44 am

        I inherited a one-pounder boat gun from my great-grandfather. It had apparently been in the family since Colonial times as a defense against river pirates and brigands while my remote Irish ancestors shipped goods down the St Lawrence River. It could fire a spread of 20 musket balls, and is still quite functional.

        Zar Belk!

  • June 12, 2016 at 4:50 am

    In the 20th Century, over 250 million people were slaughtered by their own governments…so, please, feel free to lecture to me about gun ownership….

  • June 12, 2016 at 4:51 am

    No van is an island, no van stands alone, each van is a part of the main……..

    Fear not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for we……..

    • June 12, 2016 at 8:44 am


  • June 12, 2016 at 5:39 am
    Bill G

    Even when they get the language wrong they will re-write it, and history, to become what they want. As in Dandy Andy Cuomo’s SAFE Act in NY, where he rammed it through to get bragging rights to the first gun law passed after Newton and did it so fast that even LEO’s were not exempted from magazine size requirements.
    Or just get a court to twist it to what they want as in New Jersey’s Torricelli maneuver.

  • June 12, 2016 at 7:14 am

    Language is for the controllers use and benefit, only. So they act and believe.
    By altering the meanings of words many have “changed” the “meaning” of the US Constitution over time.

    I do not think that their altered words make it mean what they thing it means.

    The alteration of word meaning and actual words is all part of their game plan of control.

  • June 12, 2016 at 9:19 am
    Old Codger

    The impetus to disarm us increases by the day. Wile they are reducing the numbers of military members, both the numbers of firearm owners and the number of of weapons increases. Unfortunately, for them – the U.S, Armed Forces is pitifully undermanned. According to a piece I read recently, The U.S, has nowhere NEAR the largest army on the planet. Nor the Second, Third or even FOURTH! Ours is the FIFTH largest – and a distant 5th at that. Three per cent of Gun owners easily represent 6-to-1 odds AGAINST the entire DoD. When you pare the numbers down to just trigger-pullers (i.e the sharp end of the spear), the disparity rises to 15-to-1. To put this further into perspective, the coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan never enjoyed less than 5-to-1 numerical superiority. Despite enjoying superiority in numbers, technology, tactics, training and equipment, the best that coalition forces have been able to accomplish is a draw. Despite being out manned and out gunned, the insurgents have fought our forces to a stand still. One is forced to ask how well government forces would fare when they are on the wrong end of 10-to-1 (or worse) numerical superiority.

    The ratio of “indians” to “chiefs” has always – AND WILL ALWAYS favor the “indians”.

    • June 12, 2016 at 6:37 pm
      John M.

      Remember that the “trigger-pullers” in Iraq and Afghanistan, like the ones before them in Vietnam, are working under rules of engagement that are more complex than the Tax Code, and have to go “up the line,” sometimes as far as DOD, just to get permission to fire.

  • June 12, 2016 at 9:33 am
    B Woodman

    I have heard bandied about from time to time, that if the Constitution Is ever re-written (shudder), or if there’s an Article Five convention, there needs to be an Amendment Zero, to the effect,
    “No member of Congress, employee of the Federal government, members of the Judicial and Executive branches, bureaucrats of any and all agencies of the Federal government — shall be exempt from any and all laws, rules and regulations passed and enforced by the Federal government. Congress and the Executive branch shall be held jointly responsible for any and all rules and regulations created by any bureaucratic agency of the Federal government, even though said rules and regulations were not voted on and passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.”

    • June 12, 2016 at 10:58 am

      Precision of Language please. You left out the following:
      Executive Orders. These are written down and signed. These can be voided with the use of a pen.
      Executive Actions. These are verbal. Who will remember how many are out there still running in the background?

  • June 12, 2016 at 10:28 am

    There are times when one must wonder, do these government tools think that the unarmed left will be able to overcome the armed right? Do their freebies mean as much to them as our freedom means to us?

  • June 12, 2016 at 10:41 am

    That van will have to be hosed — inside.

  • June 12, 2016 at 10:47 am

    I wonder how many of the occupants of that van are having Come to Jesus moments? Which of them will repent and atone their evil deeds?

    How long will they be left to stew in their own remorse and bodily fluids?
    Might want to send a water truck for hosing them down. They are going to be riper than any abattoir, or dirty backroom dealings at at Congress, or the Clinton Foundation.

  • June 12, 2016 at 11:30 am

    50 dead in FL, an hour from me, an hour from Chris, and Port St Lucie is where my Mom and sister live.

    I don’t go to nightclubs, especially gay nightclubs, but that is irrelevant…that was just a target of convenience, and we are all at risk. Whether the moratorium on muz influx would or could matter in a case like this is unknown, but what is known is that the more influx of “people” who hate us and everything about us, the more such incidents will occur.

    And more directly to the gist of this ‘toon, how many who are capable and/or predisposed to such are being actively seeded and dispersed into our midst, and to what degree could this carnage have been lessened if legally armed private patrons had been there?

    For me, one thing is sure; I will not relinquish my personal protections, and I will not be in public places by myself or with my family without at least the means to try to respond.

    • June 12, 2016 at 1:38 pm

      Thanks JTC. How far do you think this will spread in National news?
      It does appear to be Ramalama Ding Dong associated.

      • June 12, 2016 at 2:44 pm

        Oh they can’t avoid coverage of “worst in history”.

        But of course it’ll be entirely laid at the feet of guns and Constitutionalists while the happy feet of the enablers dance away in the blood of innocents.

      • June 12, 2016 at 4:34 pm
        B Woodman

        It’s already out there, all over, LSDM and Interwebz, that the perp is (was) a homegrown quoranderthal jihadi. Parents were Afghani immigrants. Devout muzzie. More details to follow, but that’s the gist of it. It’s in the open, no hiding it.

        And YET there are Libidiots insisting that it’s the “guns”.

        Two “protected” DildoCrat classes, fudge packers and quoranimals. One attacks the other. What’s a poor Libtard to do? Shit? Or go blind?
        My sincere condolences to the attacked and the deceased. But I LOVE it when the Left attack their own.

      • June 12, 2016 at 4:57 pm

        So today, let us all be Rahm Emmanuel and “never let a good crisis go to waste.”

        Choose a number of prominent gun-free commercial establishments in your vicinity, and send them an email TODAY. Tell them that in view of the recent mass murder in Orlando, yet another in a long string of spree shootings in America, every one of which was committed in a gun free zone, that you have finally resolved that you and your family will never again spend one more minute or one more dollar in any commercial enterprise that advertises that its patrons are all defenseless. Name a nearby competitor that respects your rights as the alternate place that you will bring your business from now on.

        Do it while the atrocity is still fresh.

        I myself will be messaging the Outback chain (including Carrabba’s), New York Pizza, and a couple of local chains. How about you?

    • June 12, 2016 at 4:01 pm

      This is about 40 miles North of me. I am North of JTC.

      The killer was a first generation born here invader born to Afghans.
      many Afghans have a culture as warriors and jihad. This is nothing that many did not expect. This entire invasion effort must be revisited when sane Americans are in office.
      Gays do not have a command to kill all who are not gay. Islam has a command by Allah to slay all who are not Islam.

      Yet another reason why Islam must die. They will continue until all not Islam are dead. that is in their commands. Those who have enabled them are traitors. Whether Islam is a tool to destroy the west, or just on its own desiring to destroy the West as its 1992 Muslim brotherhood Plan shows for takeover of the USA, Islam is against you to the point of killing you if you are not Islam, or their kind of Islam.

      They are not ashamed of death sentences.

  • June 12, 2016 at 12:58 pm

    Queers are hated by Muslims. Musis throw queers off buildings in the middle east. Yet, queers support the liberal left wing which is importing the musis into America by the hundreds every day. The thing musis and queers have in common is they both despise Christians. It is purely a vicious cycle.

  • June 12, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    Second Amendment Quotes
    “The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.”   Hubert Humphrey, Democrat, U.S Senator and Vice President
    “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”  Thomas Jefferson
    “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act of depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”  Mahatma Gandhi
    “The totalitarian states can do great things, but there is one thing they cannot do: they cannot give the factory-worker a rifle and tell him to take it home and keep it in his bedroom. That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer’s cottage, is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.” – George Orwell
    “Clearly, there remains to this day a horrible, condescending attitude toward armed American citizens. Haven’t the British yet gotten over the fact that a ragtag, often disorganized force of American colonials, wielding their own arms, was able to defeat what at the time was the most powerful armed force in the world? Our forefathers, armed with their own flintlock rifles and pistols, and an assortment of muskets—the ‘assault weapons’ of their era—threw off the yoke of oppression under which they were forced to live. When British broadcasters today demand to know just what it is about gun ownership that Americans defend so vigorously, the answer is too simple for them to comprehend. Simply put, we defend this individual civil right because without our own guns two centuries ago, we would still… likely be British subjects…” – Alan Gottlieb
    “The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms has justly been considered the palladium of the liberties of the republic, since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of the rulers, and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.” – Supreme Court Justice, Joseph Story, 1833
    “In truth, a state that deprives its law-abiding citizens of the means to effectively defend themselves is not civilized but barbarous…revealing its totalitarian nature by its tacit admission that the disorganized, random havoc created by criminals is far less a threat than are men and women who believe themselves free and independent, and act accordingly.” – Jeffrey Snyder, A Nation of Cowards
    “Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms? – James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 46.

  • June 12, 2016 at 4:28 pm

    Damn, I needed that. Thanks Chris.

  • June 12, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    “Once?” I don’t understand that reference. They’re STILL exempt from Obamacare. You only need to do it once, providing you never reverse it. “Immediately” would have been more meaningful wording.

  • June 12, 2016 at 6:59 pm

    To paraphrase the obvious: Guns keep civilization and its people civilized, and the government in checked balance.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 300 0