I beg your pardon for hijacking the comments section, but something important requires immediate action by voters in Pennsylvania.
In Pennsylvania in 2020, the state law required all mail-in ballots to have a legible postmark and arrive before the polls closed at 8:00 p.m. on Election Day. The Democrats waged lawfare and the final decree, after a 4-3 Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision and a rare 4-4 tied vote by the US Supreme Court, was that ‘mail-in’ ballots with no postmarks at all that arrived by 5:00 p.m. on the Friday after Election Day were “valid” and “timely”.
This neatly sidestepped the federal law against mail fraud, which still requires a valid postmark. The postal inspectors have no jurisdiction over pieces of paper with no postmarks. The generic penalty for any sort of ballot fraud is up to one year in prison and a $1000 fine, per count. The penalty for mail fraud involving a ballot is up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, per count.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court deliberately made election fraud much safer for the fraudsters. This decision clearly was made purely for the purpose of party politics, and had nothing to do with justice. Each of those four idiots in robes made a mockery of his or her title of ‘Justice’ by placing politics before justice.
Today, three of them shall be judged themselves.
Three Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices who voted to make it easier for Joe Biden to steal the Presidency in the 2020 election are on the ballot in today’s election. Please vote ‘No’ to decline to retain these three Justices if you are registered to vote in Pennsylvania.
For more details, go to Substack and search for “It’s finally payback time: Vote ‘No’ to get rid of three Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices who helped Biden steal the Presidency” . Keep the quotation marks when you cut-and-paste the title of the article.
Hijack accepted. I’m in Bucks County, ready to vote today. and I WILL be voting NO, That is NO!, on term extension of these Judges that have done much aligned judicial activism against us.
It would be a crying shame if a *Tabasco-sized” hole appeared in the southern fenceline. You know how dangerous large animals can be. Yes indeed, got to keep the fences maintained well to keep those unwanted predators at a distance.
Mari should be smarter than that and see through the conflict between Zed and John.
Sam should be the mediator in the conflict. It should be keeping Mari happy and contented for her own good.
The Disclaimer on this is I have always refused to see the John Wick movies since that violence porn has been irritating to me. I don’t need violence in my life and always considered John Wick as just another violent bad guy. I don’t invite those into my home or entertainment.
I’ve seen all the John Wick movies and I IMHO you have the character wrong. He came from a very violent world, but he had gotten out. His revenge meant going up against some really bad people, first as retribution, then as survival.
Sam can casually mention to Mari that “hey, I heard John is helping to set up a Muslim community next to our south parcel. Isn’t that exciting?”
If Mari doesn’t respond with something like “target-rich environment” then she was raised wrong.
Ideally, Zed could call in a favor from his service. One fine day, a training session involving suborbital munitions gone wrong makes it rain fire from the sky just south of his south parcel. Military mishaps happen, and can be so hard to trace to a root cause.
Right now, Blood thinks he has the upper hand. He needs to be recalibrated with respect to connections.
14 Comments
I beg your pardon for hijacking the comments section, but something important requires immediate action by voters in Pennsylvania.
In Pennsylvania in 2020, the state law required all mail-in ballots to have a legible postmark and arrive before the polls closed at 8:00 p.m. on Election Day. The Democrats waged lawfare and the final decree, after a 4-3 Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision and a rare 4-4 tied vote by the US Supreme Court, was that ‘mail-in’ ballots with no postmarks at all that arrived by 5:00 p.m. on the Friday after Election Day were “valid” and “timely”.
This neatly sidestepped the federal law against mail fraud, which still requires a valid postmark. The postal inspectors have no jurisdiction over pieces of paper with no postmarks. The generic penalty for any sort of ballot fraud is up to one year in prison and a $1000 fine, per count. The penalty for mail fraud involving a ballot is up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, per count.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court deliberately made election fraud much safer for the fraudsters. This decision clearly was made purely for the purpose of party politics, and had nothing to do with justice. Each of those four idiots in robes made a mockery of his or her title of ‘Justice’ by placing politics before justice.
Today, three of them shall be judged themselves.
Three Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices who voted to make it easier for Joe Biden to steal the Presidency in the 2020 election are on the ballot in today’s election. Please vote ‘No’ to decline to retain these three Justices if you are registered to vote in Pennsylvania.
For more details, go to Substack and search for “It’s finally payback time: Vote ‘No’ to get rid of three Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices who helped Biden steal the Presidency” . Keep the quotation marks when you cut-and-paste the title of the article.
Hijack accepted. I’m in Bucks County, ready to vote today. and I WILL be voting NO, That is NO!, on term extension of these Judges that have done much aligned judicial activism against us.
It’s going to be a Long Election Day
Well said. The will of the People will not be heard until the People decide, conclusively, to make it so.
It would be a crying shame if a *Tabasco-sized” hole appeared in the southern fenceline. You know how dangerous large animals can be. Yes indeed, got to keep the fences maintained well to keep those unwanted predators at a distance.
Go ahead Zed, and write the proper sequel. There is nothing there leading to a good end for Mari. Mari will get over it. Yes, really.
Mari should be smarter than that and see through the conflict between Zed and John.
Sam should be the mediator in the conflict. It should be keeping Mari happy and contented for her own good.
The Disclaimer on this is I have always refused to see the John Wick movies since that violence porn has been irritating to me. I don’t need violence in my life and always considered John Wick as just another violent bad guy. I don’t invite those into my home or entertainment.
I’ve seen all the John Wick movies and I IMHO you have the character wrong. He came from a very violent world, but he had gotten out. His revenge meant going up against some really bad people, first as retribution, then as survival.
You know, nurse wives, and even nurse DIL, can be just as, er, literal, in their observations.
Sam can casually mention to Mari that “hey, I heard John is helping to set up a Muslim community next to our south parcel. Isn’t that exciting?”
If Mari doesn’t respond with something like “target-rich environment” then she was raised wrong.
Somebody is getting an unexpected visit…
Sam is not going to let her little girl get bamboozled and she is not going to let bad Blood get between Mari and Zed. Let chaos reign.
I know somewhat OT, but Peterson has some truth here that we have to understand and disseminate…
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1EwT6xzbrs/
Zed could do a “Howard Roark” (The Fountainhead – Ayn Rand) on the planned community. Just don’t stay around to be picked up by the po-po.
Ideally, Zed could call in a favor from his service. One fine day, a training session involving suborbital munitions gone wrong makes it rain fire from the sky just south of his south parcel. Military mishaps happen, and can be so hard to trace to a root cause.
Right now, Blood thinks he has the upper hand. He needs to be recalibrated with respect to connections.