• May 8, 2015 at 9:13 pm

    Yes, she’s “asking to be raped”. We all are.
    And it’s happening.

    • May 9, 2015 at 9:37 am

      That happened when the low info mofos gave the Blunderer in Chief 4 more years….

  • May 8, 2015 at 9:51 pm

    Radical vasectomies all around for any rapists no matter who the answer to.

    • May 8, 2015 at 10:37 pm

      Off with their heads? 😉

      Srsly, there’s lots of forms of rape. And like I said, we’re asking for, and getting it. Same punishment for these virtual rapists too, but what punishment for we who allow it? Oh, never mind, we’re living it.

    • May 9, 2015 at 8:13 am

      .30 cal scalpel?

      • May 9, 2015 at 9:24 am

        More along the lines of a Bacon Maker scalpel and plus use the leavings for feral hawg bait.

    • May 9, 2015 at 2:36 pm
      David Gonzalez

      Madam (I presume)—

      Don’t want to get too anatomical here, BUT . . .

      Vasectomies, no matter how “radical”, will prevent a male from perpetrating a rape—it only prevents them from procreating while consummating the attack. May I humbly suggest that the procedure to which you’re referring is properly called either a castration or an emasculation?

      BTW, “rape” is not the same thing as unwanted coitus. The sexual act is part of “rape”, to be sure, but rape is not merely a crime of “sex”. It also involves terrorization, degradation, humiliation, and physical battery. The penetration of sundry orifices (with whatever er, “tool” might be at hand), is not–in and of itself–the ultimate purpose of the “rape”. Rather, it is the satisfaction of the urge to “punish” the despised victim. Any sexual activity is merely another “tool” to facilitate that punishment. Thus, the teenager who out-maneuvers his date and “gets laid” in daddy’s sedan, even if it wasn’t originally the desire of his paramour, might be a cad, a reprobate, a despoiler, or simply an ungentlemanly bastard, but he is not necessarily a “rapist”—at least, not in the technical/philosophical meaning of the word.

      Okay, ladies—grasp your flails and have at me !

      • May 9, 2015 at 3:53 pm

        Actually beating the perp within an inch of its life and cutting it off works quite well.

      • May 9, 2015 at 4:23 pm
        Bad Cyborg

        Mr Gonzalez,
        I understood Pamela’s phrase “radical vasectomy” to be what the medicos would call an orchiectomy and penectomy thereby producing what the body modification crowd call a “nullo” or “smoothy”. The result would resemble a Ken doll.

        I once threatened a young “stud” with turning him into a Ken doll. He replied that if I did that I’d go to jail. I replied that while I WOULD most likely go to jail, I’d certainly get out before his junk grew back. Never saw the little peckerhead on my property again. Imagine that.

  • May 8, 2015 at 10:29 pm
    spin drift

    At what point do we start playing by “Jungle” rules?

    Hold Fast

    Spin Drift

    • May 9, 2015 at 9:11 pm

      I’d suggest sooner,rather than later.I’m ready now.

  • May 8, 2015 at 11:03 pm

    “broadcasting her desire for, or interest in, sex” is totally different from “asking to be raped”.
    ‘Asking to be raped’ is an oxymoron, IMHO.
    She might be seeking the “rough stuff” but Rape? No one really wants to be raped.

    “At what point do we start playing by “Jungle” rules?”
    It is coming spin drift.
    No right thinking person wants to see it happen here but it is, unfortunately, the only option we have left.

    You cannot “vote” your way out of a tyranny when the tyrant “owns” the voting process.
    The historic three percent will have to stand and deliver yet again it seems.

    I only hope it happens while I am still reasonably fit so that my grand kids can live in peace and Liberty.

    Look to your preps.
    stay safe

  • May 8, 2015 at 11:16 pm

    She is asking for it. With Zed as it! 🙂

  • May 8, 2015 at 11:27 pm
    B Woodman

    I got nuttin’. For once, I got nuttin’.
    All I can do is to stand up on my hind legs and show where I stand.
    And yes, I WILL budget to make a large sticker of Little Mo for the back of my 4Runner. And when I do, I will also pack my SKS with several clips (yes, that is the correct nomenclature, not magazines) in my 4Runner. There might even be pix.

    • May 9, 2015 at 8:10 am

      I believe if you know enough to know whether it takes a clip or a mag, defining which goes with which weapon, is preaching to the choir, eh?

  • May 9, 2015 at 12:06 am

    CAIR and the SPLC are both terrorist organizations.

    • May 9, 2015 at 12:59 pm
      B Woodman

      You left out the ACLU.

  • May 9, 2015 at 4:02 am
    Bill G

    I’ve been considering that comparison for a while. And been amazed at how the folks who, rightly, decry the ‘She was asking for it’ line jump in with ‘They were asking for it’ against the cartoonists.
    It was correctly said that those media types who refuse to reprint any ‘offensive’ cartoons are complying with Sharia.

  • May 9, 2015 at 4:36 am

    It’s that importing the enemy (cultures) again. mental viruses. Infected thinking. What for they bringing people into my country that desire to kill me and rape women?
    Deport them all.
    This is part of the war being waged on Western civilization. Sweden and the rest of Europe have been experiencing this and more to varying degrees, as a direct result of the traitorous, if progressively based in their delusion of good, decisions and orders for quite a while. The Qu3een, The EU rulers, and other elites has waged this war on their people. This is the only way to defeat Western Civilization. Replace the Western Civilized people with what in Western Civilization are considered savages. In Islam the raping of a woman is due to her provocative actions for the most part. Those females 9 and up are considered temptresses of men under Sharia Law. That was the age of the most merciful prophet’s last bride when he consummated their marriage.
    This is war against us on many level, all couched in what progressives can call good, and, that good is supposedly suicidal acts required by our faith, morals, and culture.
    It is not required and is opposite as we must act. Self defense of our culture is a right allowed by Natural Law and god’s Law, and as recognized by the US Constitution and amendments.
    Progressives play the meaning of words successfully twisted game.

    • May 9, 2015 at 4:38 am

      God’s Law.

  • May 9, 2015 at 7:00 am
    Dastardly Dan

    I see the Charger is now sporting Texas plates, just last week the Florida plate was still in place.

    As for jungle rules, I think the time has past to begin. The other side is laready playing by ‘god-forsaken giant sandbox’ rules.

  • May 9, 2015 at 9:47 am

    My opinion only…..a person cannot ask to be raped….

    • May 9, 2015 at 4:42 pm
      Bad Cyborg

      a person cannot ask to be raped

      True. In my best Johnny Cochran style:
      It don’t matter what she wears
      Or what she bears,
      Don’t give him license
      If she says “NO!”.
      And he don’t “WOAH!”
      Then to the hoosegow
      He must go.
      (The possessor of the penis bears sole responsibility for where it goes. Those things almost never go anywhere their possessor doesn’t want ’em to)

      That being said, anybody who goes to a convention of sadists wearing a t-shirt with “Kick Me” printed on the back shoud not be surprised at returning home with a sore ass.

  • May 9, 2015 at 2:24 pm

    As President Lincoln (arguably the most brilliant leader of modern times) understood, every social compact, including the U.S. Constitution, has its limits of applicability. You can not push the envelope indefinitely:

    The Constitution is not a suicide pact!

  • May 9, 2015 at 2:26 pm
    • May 9, 2015 at 2:51 pm

      That translates as liberty is not worth fighting for? Freedom of speech is overrated? Mob rule is OK? Slavery isn’t a problem? The Constitution should be defended by ALL Americans, at ALL cost. Freedom isn’t free.

      • May 9, 2015 at 3:02 pm

        No. You have it exactly backwards, Gary. It means Americans should defend AGAINST Obama’s attempts to subvert the Constitution via his executive orders that lead to our Nation’s suicide!

      • May 9, 2015 at 3:07 pm

        President Lincoln’s great achievement was SAVING the Union.

      • May 9, 2015 at 4:23 pm

        By violating the very Constitution you claim he should have been protecting?
        Imprisoning media outlet owners that he disagreed with?
        Violating the Constitution by violating the rights of the several States?
        The list goes on for pages.

        Lincoln PATOOIE was one of the worst Presidents we have ever had.
        Learn to read the actual histories by people who were present at the time NOT the pablum spit out by the socialist edudoctrinational system.

        Verily “The victors write the history” to suit their own ends.

        Lincoln hawwk … PATOOIE

      • May 9, 2015 at 5:01 pm

        “Lincoln PATOOIE was one of the worst Presidents we have ever had. Learn to read the actual histories by people who were present at the time NOT the pablum spit out by the socialist edudoctrinational system.”

        Name one sane historian who agrees with your insane viewpoints.

      • May 9, 2015 at 5:39 pm

        “Actual histories by people who were present at the time” is actually nonsense.

        “A historian is a person who studies and writes about the past and is regarded as an authority on it. Historians are concerned with the continuous, methodical narrative and research of past events as relating to the human race; as well as the study of all history in time.”

  • May 9, 2015 at 8:43 pm
    Dastardly Dan

    capn, sir, you are correct.
    Had Mr. Lincoln not ‘saved the union’ by violating the Constitution in many, many ways, and creating the beast that is now the Federal Government, we would not be in the mess we’re in today.
    And, before anyone goes postal, slavery would still have ended on this continent. Mechanization would have done away with the need. The blacks would have been freed and joined society in a gradual, civilized manner such as happened in England. I would go so far as to say that the racial tension between blacks and everyone else we have in this country today would not exist.
    And maybe, just maybe there would be two soverign countries in the physical bounds of today’s USA, one stable, prosperous and conservative, the other looking much like Baltimore, Detroit, and, well, you get the picture.

    • May 9, 2015 at 8:52 pm

      And if my grandmother had had balls, I am confident that she would have been my grandfather.

      • May 9, 2015 at 9:14 pm
        Dastardly Dan

        Only if your grandfather had also been transexual.
        At least my hypothetical scenario is plausible.

  • May 9, 2015 at 8:57 pm

    “President Lincoln (arguably the most brilliant leader of modern times)…”

    Yes, and arguably the worst. Also inarguably the only one who waged war on the citizens of the union he purported to save. Not unlike Putin and Ukraine in using military force to retain control of territory and resources.

    Henry, I do understand your connection and defense of your hero. But that does not excuse or change that his flouting of the portions of the Constitution that he found inconvenient to his purposes puts him in league with a potus or three of contemporary times who also fit that mold.

    And please don’t regurgitate the truisms of the most uncivil of wars being all about slavery; the “civil war” is to slavery as the Revolutionary War is to tea.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 300 0