I guessed correctly yesterday, an updated adult version of John Wayne and Maureen O’Hara, “McClintock”, near the end of the movie, where Maureen ends up down to her petticoats running through the town.
Or possibly another John/Maureen classic, “The Quiet Man”.
Anatoly and Naomi, NOT coming to a big screen near you.
MasterDiver
Feb 22 2019 at 8:43 am
I always wondered whet she whispered to him at that closing scene! );-D
Zar Belk!
The 300
Feb 22 2019 at 9:42 am
According to the “making of” feature on the DVD, no one knows. All we know is that it was something rude to surprise the Duke and get the reaction out of him that it did.
It’s almost that time of the year to watch the movie.
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman
Feb 22 2019 at 12:24 am
Naomi may not be radioactive, but she IS hot.
Think they’ll get another child out of this “reset”?
kadaka
Feb 22 2019 at 12:37 am
Are they out out of that “Irish twin” window yet?
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman
Feb 22 2019 at 12:26 am
From the second frame, I can only imagine what Big Red Button ‘Toly is pressing.
“And so, it’s not to say you get rid of agriculture. It’s not to say we’re going to force everybody to go vegan or anything crazy like that. But it’s to say, listen, we’ve got to address factory farming. Maybe we shouldn’t be eating a hamburger for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Like, let’s keep it real,” she continued.
Has she never worked second shift? Do you know anyone who can drive while eating a salad?
Fine, no Russia collusion. But we will never let you rest or let you do the job you were elected to do, MAGA. Because we hate you. And we hate those Deplorables.
And most especially we hate America. How is that not treason?
NotYetInACamp
Feb 22 2019 at 10:40 pm
They were totally wrong on the Russian collusion made up lies. ColRussian,
Time to distract from Russians.
Maybe its a distraction by handing good people a unanimous Supreme Court decision on civil forfeitures that we like as a start.
State tyranny against people by non incorporation of the limitations on the states.
… …
And on Wednesday, every justice agreed that the 14th Amendment applies the guarantee against excessive fines to the states. In her majority opinion, Ginsburg traced the right back to the Magna Carta through the English Bill of Rights and the Virginia Declaration of Rights, all of which heavily influenced the U.S. Constitution. By the time the 14th Amendment was ratified, 35 of the 37 states explicitly barred excessive fines. And during debate over ratification, congressmen noted that Southern states were using punitive fines to subjugate newly freed blacks. The framers of the 14th Amendment plainly intended to incorporate the Excessive Fines Clause to rein in these “harsh inflictions … almost reenacting slavery.”
“In short,” Ginsburg wrote, surveying this evidence, “the historical and logical case for concluding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Excessive Fines Clause is overwhelming.” She also swatted down Indiana’s fallback argument that the clause does not apply to proceedings over an individual’s property, holding that these forfeitures still qualify as “fines” that trigger constitutional scrutiny.
—-
And now the lawsuits to limit state abuses are open to be filed in federal courts. Mazel tov, da.
Is there poetry in justice? There is, and sometimes irony too.
In her writing for the court and its unanimous ruling, McDonald v. Chicago is cited multiple times to reinforce provisions and precedents.
That right there might just bite that bitch in her gnarly wrinkled old ass sometime soon. Even the smartest of socialists sometimes miss the potential of the rule of unintended consequences and end up strengthening that which they abhor in the course of arguing for that which they embrace. Heh.
NotYetInACamp
Feb 22 2019 at 10:26 pm
The Quiet Man. McClintock. любовник Cha Cha Chernobyl.
They’ve gone hot….
Reset commenced.
Henry
Well, that certainly pushes MY buttons.
JTC
Full blown meltdown, baby…
All systems are go, and all defenses are no.
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman
I guessed correctly yesterday, an updated adult version of John Wayne and Maureen O’Hara, “McClintock”, near the end of the movie, where Maureen ends up down to her petticoats running through the town.
Or possibly another John/Maureen classic, “The Quiet Man”.
Anatoly and Naomi, NOT coming to a big screen near you.
MasterDiver
I always wondered whet she whispered to him at that closing scene! );-D
Zar Belk!
The 300
According to the “making of” feature on the DVD, no one knows. All we know is that it was something rude to surprise the Duke and get the reaction out of him that it did.
It’s almost that time of the year to watch the movie.
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman
Naomi may not be radioactive, but she IS hot.
Think they’ll get another child out of this “reset”?
kadaka
Are they out out of that “Irish twin” window yet?
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman
From the second frame, I can only imagine what Big Red Button ‘Toly is pressing.
cmblake6
Not the swimming hole, but it’ll do til then…
WayneM
For now… but the swimming hole is getting lonely…
Fox2!
Quiet Man – as Thornton is drawing Kate though the village, one of the women gives him a stick to beat “the lovely lady” with.
Lucius Severus Pertinax
My FAVORITE John Wayne movie!
MasterDiver
ZAR BELK!
Sam
One of his best, as he was actually acting. Most of his other roles over the years were just Duke being Duke, with different character names.
PaulS
Launch sequence engaged!
GWB
Excellent!
nonncom
And they say men search for that button for years before finding it….ladies?….
Pete231
Button, button… who’s got the button ?
kadaka
In need of a reset button, here’smore AOC wisdom:
Has she never worked second shift? Do you know anyone who can drive while eating a salad?
JTC
RUSSIA!COLLUSION!RUSSIA!COLLUSION!RUSSIA!COLLUSION!
For two damn years. And now…
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-faces-legal-issues-for-the-rest-of-his-presidency-no-matter-what-mueller-finds/ar-BBTWQoC?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout
Fine, no Russia collusion. But we will never let you rest or let you do the job you were elected to do, MAGA. Because we hate you. And we hate those Deplorables.
And most especially we hate America. How is that not treason?
NotYetInACamp
They were totally wrong on the Russian collusion made up lies. ColRussian,
Time to distract from Russians.
Maybe its a distraction by handing good people a unanimous Supreme Court decision on civil forfeitures that we like as a start.
State tyranny against people by non incorporation of the limitations on the states.
… …
And on Wednesday, every justice agreed that the 14th Amendment applies the guarantee against excessive fines to the states. In her majority opinion, Ginsburg traced the right back to the Magna Carta through the English Bill of Rights and the Virginia Declaration of Rights, all of which heavily influenced the U.S. Constitution. By the time the 14th Amendment was ratified, 35 of the 37 states explicitly barred excessive fines. And during debate over ratification, congressmen noted that Southern states were using punitive fines to subjugate newly freed blacks. The framers of the 14th Amendment plainly intended to incorporate the Excessive Fines Clause to rein in these “harsh inflictions … almost reenacting slavery.”
“In short,” Ginsburg wrote, surveying this evidence, “the historical and logical case for concluding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Excessive Fines Clause is overwhelming.” She also swatted down Indiana’s fallback argument that the clause does not apply to proceedings over an individual’s property, holding that these forfeitures still qualify as “fines” that trigger constitutional scrutiny.
—-
And now the lawsuits to limit state abuses are open to be filed in federal courts. Mazel tov, da.
NotYetInACamp
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/02/supreme-court-rules-against-civil-forfeitures-rbg-timbs.html
I suppose that I should have put the site citation.
NotYetInACamp
https://ij.org/report/forfeiture-transparency-accountability/
NotYetInACamp
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1091_5536.pdf
The Supreme Court Opinion in Timbs v. Indiana
JTC
Is there poetry in justice? There is, and sometimes irony too.
In her writing for the court and its unanimous ruling, McDonald v. Chicago is cited multiple times to reinforce provisions and precedents.
That right there might just bite that bitch in her gnarly wrinkled old ass sometime soon. Even the smartest of socialists sometimes miss the potential of the rule of unintended consequences and end up strengthening that which they abhor in the course of arguing for that which they embrace. Heh.
NotYetInACamp
The Quiet Man. McClintock. любовник Cha Cha Chernobyl.
They’ve gone hot….
Reset commenced.