theme-sticky-logo-alt
PREVIOUS POST
Bear With Me.
NEXT POST
Dibs.

40 Comments

  • September 3, 2025 at 1:05 am
    Too Tall

    And I’m proud to be an American, where at least I know I’m free….

    The United States, proudly taking out the globe’s trash for 249 years!

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 1:11 am
    Henry

    OMG, that’s an actual headline!

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 1:18 am
    rickn8or

    While CB’s Chicken Fried Steak ain’t what it used to be, “No charges for Texas man who beat his daughter’s molester to death” will be the same forevermore, ahh-men.

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 2:04 am
      larryarnold

      It’s a good thing he was in Texas, and not in Austin or Houston.

      REPLY
      • September 3, 2025 at 7:39 am
        Whiskey Mike

        Ain’t that the truth.

      • September 5, 2025 at 3:00 am
        RyGuy

        It’s just more expensive to work your way up to the state Supreme Court in those stinking towns. But thanks to Mutually Assured Gerrymandering, that’s about to become the only advantage leftoids anywhere in Texas will ever have again.

  • September 3, 2025 at 1:19 am
    Too Tall

    The deceased perv was a rising star in the Demoncrat party.

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 1:43 am
      PeregrineJohn

      Oh? I hadn’t looked it up yet, but figured he’d be some such. Or an aspiring rapper. Dangerous occupation, that.

      REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 2:49 am
      resolute

      Outrageous part is that he’s probably going to continue to be a rising stare amongst his fellow pervs. Why does the word martyr come to mind?

      REPLY
      • September 3, 2025 at 6:45 am
        MasterDiver

        Martyrs share one redeeming quality: They’re all dead!
        –Tom Clancy

        Zar Belk!

  • September 3, 2025 at 2:55 am
    Henry

    He was an aspiring r*per, but he didn’t make the cut.

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 3:34 am
    JohninMd.(HALP!)

    Did Dad use a blade? Hard core! Most punks fear being cut more than being shot….

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 4:06 am
    Tom Stockton

    Ah, Texas… where “He needed killin'” is a perfect legal defense…

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 5:10 am
      Heltau

      There are so MANY people that come under that line, “He needed killin'”
      So many there may not be enough bullets to get er done.

      REPLY
      • September 3, 2025 at 6:52 am
        Steve+Peterson

        Rope is cheaper and reusable

    • September 3, 2025 at 11:11 am
      Nancy

      I’m not sure if that’s actually a legal defense here, but it should be.

      REPLY
      • September 3, 2025 at 12:39 pm
        The Nth Doctor

        *Technically*, yes, “The sumbitch *needed* killin’!” *is* an allowable defense argument here in Texas. 🙂

        Now, whether or not you (or your lawyer) can convince the judge and jury to *buy* the argument is another matter entirely, but you *are* at least allowed to raise it as a defense… 😀

  • September 3, 2025 at 6:34 am
    badger52

    Make Recidivism Zero Again.

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 6:52 am
      Walt C. Snedeker

      badger52 — I believe you have coined a great phrase for conservatives to use “liberally”.

      REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 7:49 am
    Oldarmourer

    Meanwhile, up here a man broke into someone’s house armed with a crossbow and was beaten for his troubles….the homeowner was charged with assault.

    It’s too late for us, save yourselves.

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 10:26 am
      WayneM

      Based on what’s hit the media, I disagree with the police’s decision to arrest the homeowner. As far as I’m concerned, anyone breaking into an apartment armed with a crossbow has crossed the line. It’s worth noting the invader had two accomplices waiting outside. Some media outlets claim the homeowner and the invader know each other.

      The local police chief is quoted as affirming people can used “reasonable force” to protect themselves without specifically saying why the homeowner was arrested. Apparently the homeowner’s use of a kitchen knife to defend his Castle was too much for the cops?

      REPLY
      • September 4, 2025 at 9:53 am
        Oldarmourer

        I have little or no doubt that the ‘invaders’ knew the ‘invadee’, most likely they were there to steal drugs or drug money, or he owed them a lot for a bad deal.

        BUT…there have been instances of criminals getting the wrong house and completely innocent people being injured and even killed when they can’t produce what the invaders demand, this might even have been such an instance, hence the requirement for the ability to defend yourself and family since the police not only can’t be there 24/7/365 but the ywon’t do sanything in fear of being called racist, islamophobic, etc. if those involved are, as 90-odd percent are, of a non-caucasian persuasion.

      • September 4, 2025 at 10:06 am
        Oldarmourer

        The definition of ‘reasonable force’ has so many caveats and exceptions in the Criminal Code that it’s entirely possible for a judge to rule that if an armed intruder breaks into your home and you meet them with a weapon of your own, once you’ve disarmed them you must drop your own weapon in order to meet the ‘force for force received’ definition…and I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to find out that rukling had already been made. Virtually every judge at all levels and almost all of the Supreme Court has been appointed by liebrals and there’s no approval process for it, the PM says “they’re a judge” and they’re a judge, no qualifications needed other than blind party loyalty…one just declared that ‘bike paths’ on major city streets are a Constitutional right ffs o.O

      • September 5, 2025 at 10:13 am
        WayneM

        Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6, as the old saying goes…

        On the upside, it seems like the incident reminded Doughboy Ford (provincial premier) to pretend to be conservative for a day… and maybe Pierre Poilievre (federal opposition leader) will push for some form of Castle Doctrine or at least an update to the Criminal Code.

  • September 3, 2025 at 8:20 am
    Saaruuk

    Oldarmourer…..”up here”…..where the hell are you?

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 8:56 am
      Rapid Robert

      Ontario Provence, Canada. About a week ago.

      REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 9:27 am
      John D. Egbert

      Judging by the spelling of his monicker, I’d guess Canukistan . . .

      REPLY
    • September 4, 2025 at 9:57 am
      Oldarmourer

      How many ‘up here’s’ from the US are there ? 😉

      I don’t live in Ontario, you couldn’t pay me enough to get within rifle range of Toronto, but yes, Canada, the first once -Sovereign country to be sold into servitude to foreign interests by it’s own gov’t.

      REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 10:11 am
    WayneM

    One of the wonderful things I learned by marrying a Texan woman was how good chicken fried steak can be and the origins of such.

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 10:12 am
    Craig

    Kudos to the Dad! In the words of RAH “it’s not good for some people to live too long”

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 11:09 am
      Nancy

      Heinlein was a wise man.

      REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 10:59 am
    Nancy

    I remember the incident referred to above. I was still trapped in California at the time,(2012) and I didn’t understand what all the fuss was about.

    Shows you why I didn’t belong in CA, even though I’d been there since 1970.

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 11:14 am
    Brodder

    Isn’t chicken fried steak, just a southern version of schnitzel?
    Cept one uses real meat instead of veal or pork.

    REPLY
    • September 3, 2025 at 9:55 pm
      WayneM

      Yup, exactly. Immigrant European settlers (especially Germans) wanted schnitzel; pork wasn’t common but there was plenty of beef. One thing led to another.

      REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 1:15 pm
    Geezer
  • September 3, 2025 at 2:08 pm
    David

    The word “reasonable” should be banned from use in any legal document or argument.

    REPLY
  • September 3, 2025 at 5:44 pm
    Bryan E

    “Under the law in the state of Texas deadly force is authorized and justified in order to stop an aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault,” District Attorney Heather McMinn told reporters.

    REPLY
    • September 4, 2025 at 9:48 pm
      Oldarmourer

      That should read ‘mandatory’ and every able bodies or armed person within shouting distance should be rounded up, asked “why didn’t you do something to help ?” and charged with being an accessory and public endangerment.

      REPLY
  • September 4, 2025 at 1:28 am
    Rolando

    Tennessee law holds that anyone entering someone’s home without the resident’s approval beforehand can be assumed to be an invader with the intent to kill or cause serious bodily and deadly force is authorized. A “stand your ground” law is also in place as is a (unrelated) law holding the facility owner liable for allowing men in drag (drag queens) in any area where children MIGHT BE present…heavy fines and liquor license revoked. Also open/concealed constitutional carry of a firearm for all law-abiding resident citizens. Super-majority Republican Legislature and Gov with 2 fire-eating US Senators. God only knows why I ever left…as a Tennessean by the Grace of God, although a natural-born Pre-War Redondo Beach Californian.

    REPLY
    • September 4, 2025 at 1:30 am
      Rolando

      **bodily harm**

      REPLY

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.daybydaycartoon.com 300 0